| Summary: | [945G] Incorrect tiling/swizzling configuration | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | DRI | Reporter: | Pavel Ondračka <pavel.ondracka> | ||||||||||||||||
| Component: | DRM/Intel | Assignee: | Daniel Vetter <daniel> | ||||||||||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||||||||||||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||||||||||||||
| Priority: | high | CC: | ben, bugzilla, chris, daniel, jbarnes, Pitxyoki | ||||||||||||||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||||||||||||||
| Hardware: | Other | ||||||||||||||||||
| OS: | All | ||||||||||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||||||||||
| i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Created attachment 53189 [details]
Xorg.0.log
Created attachment 53190 [details]
dmesg
Created attachment 53191 [details]
glxinfo
Can I have a few details as to how the wallpaper is being rendered? Are using you using gnome-shell, nautilus, kwin, etc? This is using gnome 3 fallback mode, but i did have the some problem with gnome 2 and nautilus. Can you please download intel-gpu-tools [git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools] and execute gem_tiled_blits and gem_tiled_pread? That should hopefully verify the basic tiling works. Created attachment 53203 [details] [review] print out detected swizzle configuration Can you please apply this kernel patch and attach the ouput of it? Also please attach the lspci -nn line for your gpu. gem_tiled_blits:
Starting program: /home/Marie/intel-gpu-tools/tests/gem_tiled_blits
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using 383 1MiB buffers
Verifying initialisation...
Expected 0x00180080, found 0x00180090 at offset 0x00000200
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x00110416 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x00110416 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x4684e26f in __GI_raise (sig=6)
at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64
resultvar = <optimized out>
resultvar = <optimized out>
pid = 1184530420
selftid = 8924
#2 0x4684fba5 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:93
save_stage = 2
act = {__sigaction_handler = {sa_handler = 0x80481dc,
sa_sigaction = 0x80481dc}, sa_mask = {__val = {3221221820,
1182915156, 0, 3086906952, 1, 0, 1, 1182914808, 0, 134537104,
40, 0, 134517524, 134532104, 1183785625, 1206927608, 1206897028,
7, 0, 3221221876, 3221221904, 1184530420, 134580568, 134580568,
1182914808, 0, 134532224, 134514235, 1140799, 134532224,
1074553951, 3221221876}}, sa_flags = 134528388,
sa_restorer = 0x804cf78}
sigs = {__val = {32, 0 <repeats 31 times>}}
#3 0x080492b4 in check_bo (bo=<optimized out>, start_val=<optimized out>)
at gem_tiled_blits.c:122
linear_bo = 0x8058958
linear = 0xa13e6000
i = <optimized out>
#4 0x08048dde in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff394) at gem_tiled_blits.c:170
bo = 0x804c008
bo_start_val = 0x804c608
start = 100401152
i = <optimized out>
fd = 7
count = 383
gem_tiled_pread:
Starting program: /home/Marie/intel-gpu-tools/tests/gem_tiled_pread
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Bad read [0]: 16 instead of 0 at 0x00000000 for read from 0x00000000 to 0x00100000, swizzle=none
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x00110416 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x00110416 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x4684e26f in __GI_raise (sig=6)
at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64
resultvar = <optimized out>
resultvar = <optimized out>
pid = 1184530420
selftid = 8948
#2 0x4684fba5 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:93
save_stage = 2
act = {__sigaction_handler = {sa_handler = 0x80481dc,
sa_sigaction = 0x80481dc}, sa_mask = {__val = {3221221836,
1182915156, 0, 3086906952, 1, 0, 1, 1182914808, 3221221872,
1182914808, 1, 134522904, 3087006040, 0, 3086906952, 1206891120,
1, 0, 0, 134523020, 3221221920, 1182963268, 134522968, 0,
1182914808, 0, 1182870064, 134513638, 1183785600, 7, 4294967295,
134522968}}, sa_flags = 1182912452, sa_restorer = 0xb7fff958}
sigs = {__val = {32, 0 <repeats 31 times>}}
#3 0x08048b7c in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff394) at gem_tiled_pread.c:286
expected_val = 0
found_val = <optimized out>
swizzled_offset = <optimized out>
swizzle_str = 0x80493b4 "none"
size = 1048576
offset = 0
len = <optimized out>
j = <optimized out>
fd = 7
i = <optimized out>
tiling = <optimized out>
swizzle = 0
handle = 1
devid = <optimized out>
$ lspci -nn 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ/P/PL Memory Controller Hub [8086:2770] (rev 02) 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ/P/PL PCI Express Root Port [8086:2771] (rev 02) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2772] (rev 02) 00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2776] (rev 02) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI Express Port 1 [8086:27d0] (rev 01) 00:1c.1 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family PCI Express Port 2 [8086:27d2] (rev 01) 00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:27c8] (rev 01) 00:1d.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI Controller #2 [8086:27c9] (rev 01) 00:1d.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI Controller #3 [8086:27ca] (rev 01) 00:1d.3 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB UHCI Controller #4 [8086:27cb] (rev 01) 00:1d.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family USB2 EHCI Controller [8086:27cc] (rev 01) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge [8086:244e] (rev e1) 00:1e.2 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) AC'97 Audio Controller [8086:27de] (rev 01) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82801GB/GR (ICH7 Family) LPC Interface Bridge [8086:27b8] (rev 01) 00:1f.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) IDE Controller [8086:27df] (rev 01) 00:1f.2 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH7 Family SATA IDE Controller [8086:27c0] (rev 01) 00:1f.3 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family SMBus Controller [8086:27da] (rev 01) 02:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5751 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express [14e4:1677] (rev 01) 04:02.0 Multimedia controller [0480]: Philips Semiconductors SAA7131/SAA7133/SAA7135 Video Broadcast Decoder [1131:7133] (rev d0) Woot, tiling is indeed broken. Pavel, can you grab the debug output of my kernel patch, please? I'll try to dig up what's going wrong with my i915G meanwhile, that fails in a similar fashion with the intel-gpu-tools tests. Created attachment 53232 [details]
new kernel log
Hi, sorry it took so long, this is old P4 system and kernel compilation takes ages. I hope I did it right, there is just one extra line printed:
[ 6.908466] bit6 swizzling for x: 0 and for y 0
Full log attached.
> --- Comment #11 from Pavel Ondračka <pavel.ondracka@email.cz> 2011-11-06 23:45:56 PST ---
> Hi, sorry it took so long, this is old P4 system and kernel compilation takes
> ages. I hope I did it right, there is just one extra line printed:
> [ 6.908466] bit6 swizzling for x: 0 and for y 0
> Full log attached.
No problem. Interesting that your machine is a P4, too. Next thing to do:
Can you please check the ram module configuration of your machine? I'd
need the capacity of every module and in which slot and channel it's in.
Can you also check in your bios whether there's a ddr ram config option
like "channel interleave" and report its setting (if it exists).
Thanks, Daniel
OK, some info from BIOS, if you need more Iľl need more detailed instructions how to obtain it. Memory size: 1,0GB Memory speed: 533MHz Memory channel mode: Dual Interleaved Memory technology: DDR2 SDRAM ------------+------------+------+----------+-------------- Memory slot | Size | ECC | Rank | Type | Organization ------------+------------+------+----------+-------------- DIMM 1 |512 MB| no | 1 |Unbuffered| x8 ------------+------------+------+----------+-------------- DIMM 2 |empty | | | | ------------+------------+------+----------+-------------- DIMM 3 |512 MB| no | 1 |Unbuffered| x8 ------------+------------+------+----------+-------------- DIMM 4 |empty | | | | ------------+------------+------+----------+-------------- Created attachment 53264 [details] [review] fix swizzle detection on gen3/4 Please test this kernel patch, both with the test from intel-gpu-tools and with your background image. (In reply to comment #14) > Created attachment 53264 [details] [review] [review] > fix swizzle detection on gen3/4 > > Please test this kernel patch, both with the test from intel-gpu-tools and with > your background image. Hi, both tests now execute without crash and no corruption so far. Thank you for incredibly fast response and patch. I've added your tested-by to the patch I'll submit. To double-check that things work correctly now, can you please try my swizzling branch at http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm/log/?h=swizzling and attach the contents of i915_swizzle_info from debugfs? (In reply to comment #16) > I've added your tested-by to the patch I'll submit. To double-check that things > work correctly now, can you please try my swizzling branch at > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm/log/?h=swizzling > > and attach the contents of i915_swizzle_info from debugfs? $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_swizzle_info bit6 swizzle for X-tiling = bit9/bit10/bit17 bit6 swizzle for Y-tiling = bit9/bit17 DDC = 0x000f0202 C0DRB3 = 0x04020000 C1DRB3 = 0x0e0d0d0d Hi, what is the current status of this patch. Will it be also included in stable kernels (particularly 3.0.x )? Patch is submitted with Cc stable tag, but not yet reviewed. So I plan to push it to 3.0.x stable series, but it's likely gonna take a little while longer till it's there. Hi, sorry to bring this up again, but its been almost three moths and the patch which fixes this bug is still not committed. Is there anything I can do (more testing?) to speed things up? > --- Comment #20 from Pavel Ondračka <pavel.ondracka@email.cz> 2012-01-22 02:58:23 PST ---
> Hi, sorry to bring this up again, but its been almost three moths and the patch
> which fixes this bug is still not committed. Is there anything I can do (more
> testing?) to speed things up?
Nope, and my apologies for the delay. We've had a bunch of process
screw-ups here in drm/i915-land, which resulted in this patch (and
quite a few other things) getting delayed for months.
It should land in the new drm-intel-next tree in 1-2 weeks (we still
have a backlog of merging patches).
Yours, Daniel
Patch merged to drm-intel-next, on track to get merged to 3.4. *** Bug 21539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** removing the block relationship, assuming there's no plan to backport to 3.2.x or 3.3.x. (In reply to comment #24) > removing the block relationship, assuming there's no plan to backport to 3.2.x > or 3.3.x. Well, according to comment 19 there was some plan to backport this. The first version of the patch in the danvet swizzle branch was tagged for stable, the version in drm-intel-next however is not. It would be nice to have this backported, but its not a big deal. A patch referencing this bug report has been merged in Linux v3.4-rc1: commit c9c4b6f6c28354f1df9bd288dc33ba7ae0e66aaa Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Date: Wed Dec 14 13:57:15 2011 +0100 drm/i915: fix swizzle detection for gen3 *** Bug 55551 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Hi, Like I said on bug 55551, I'm testing this patch against the Debian 3.2 kernel. Along with the other two commits mentioned on that bug the issues seem to be gone. Is it possible to merge the mentioned commit (c9c4b6f6c28354f1df9bd288dc33ba7ae0e66aaa) to the 3.2-stable branch? Thanks and best regards, Luís Picciochi On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:53 PM, <bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org> wrote: > Is it possible to merge the mentioned commit > (c9c4b6f6c28354f1df9bd288dc33ba7ae0e66aaa) to the 3.2-stable branch? Sure, simple send the (upstream) git sha1 to the stable team with a note that it should be applied to 3.2 and a link to this bug. Also please cc me, so that I can ack it. -Daniel |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.
Created attachment 53188 [details] small part of the corrupted wallpaper After some time using my desktop, the wallpaper becomes corrupted, it looks chequered as if some parts of the screen were switched (screenshot attached). This is not a SNA regression, I just tried SNA to check if this is fixed there and its not. No visible corruption in any other part of the desktop, just the wallpaper.