Summary: | [next] consider grouping some properties in a GVariant | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Telepathy | Reporter: | Guillaume Desmottes <guillaume.desmottes> |
Component: | tp-glib | Assignee: | Telepathy bugs list <telepathy-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED MOVED | QA Contact: | Telepathy bugs list <telepathy-bugs> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | medium | CC: | xclaesse |
Version: | git master | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: |
Description
Guillaume Desmottes
2012-05-07 23:53:29 UTC
For *-presence, I would rather have typedef struct { TpConnectionPresenceType type; gchar *status; gchar *message; } TpPresence; Much more convenient that even a GVariant. For connection-error and connection-error-detailed seems like something we added for compat and could be reduced to only the -detailed in next (as a GVariant of course). That means we'd have to define a boxed type for this struct right? Is that binding friendly? Yep, should be fine with a boxed, AFAIK. -- GitLab Migration Automatic Message -- This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity. You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/telepathy/telepathy-glib/issues/93. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.