Summary: | Macros: sorting range in calc in 3.6 puts nulls ahead of filled in rows | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | LibreOffice | Reporter: | bugzilla |
Component: | BASIC | Assignee: | Noel Power <nopower> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | CC: | nopower, pierre-yves.samyn |
Version: | 3.6.0.4 release | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | BSA target:3.7.0 target:3.6.3 | ||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Attachments: | Bug 53814 - example |
Description
bugzilla
2012-08-19 19:28:54 UTC
Accepted. Very annoying bug. please could you add an example document with some sample data and the macro ( not just a snippet ) to reproduce this ? would make things much easier Created attachment 68214 [details] Bug 53814 - example (In reply to comment #3) > Created attachment 68214 [details] > Bug 53814 - example In attachment - text is true: 'After deleting „List2“, saved and closed/reopened LibreOffice/this sheet: sorting is OK' ok, I see it, very strange that the presence of entries on sheet 2 that point back to the data on sheet1 to be sorted affect the sorting order. Thanks for the example, at least now it is easily reproduceable meant to say I would take this too Noel Power committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=44e8a8240a3a1cce747f1998e617f8dd4621a992 fix for fdo#53814 Revert "there should be no need any more for this check" The patch should be included in the daily builds available at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. Noel Power committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "libreoffice-3-6": http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=cd9d51a36cc3106d4124855874af657615a93061&g=libreoffice-3-6 fix for fdo#53814 Revert "there should be no need any more for this check" It will be available in LibreOffice 3.6.4. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. Noel Power committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "libreoffice-3-6-3": http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c450c73ab7c83a55209cc7de9381cc32eb6313ff&g=libreoffice-3-6-3 fix for fdo#53814 Revert "there should be no need any more for this check" It will be available already in LibreOffice 3.6.3. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. Noel Power committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=71ada2fb20cdb1741767165948a2856b4198c700 regression test for fdo#53814 The patch should be included in the daily builds available at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. *** Bug 55712 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** libreoffice-3-6~2012-10-12_13.47.16_LibO-Dev_3.6.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.msi Version 3.6.4.0+ (Build ID: 14a24950) The error is corrected, OK. Thank you very much :) Hello I confirm that the bug has been resolved: I reproduce with Version 3.6.2.2 (Build ID: da8c1e6) and do not reproduce with Version 3.6.4.0+ (Build ID: a010c4e) My Bug 55712 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. However I have to reopen it because 3.6.4 did not solve. Regards Pierre-Yves |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.