Summary: | endstream detection | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | poppler | Reporter: | Thomas Freitag <Thomas.Freitag> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | poppler-bugs <poppler-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Attachments: | endstream detection and scanSpecialFlags correction |
Description
Thomas Freitag
2013-04-01 09:10:47 UTC
Not sure i understand what to test for point 2, saving or opening? (In reply to comment #1) > Not sure i understand what to test for point 2, saving or opening? Saving: Open the PDF in okular and modify it. All changes should be lost if You save it then (if okular doesn't save the PDF automatically after opening because it detects that the PDF is broken). So i see this as two separate patches, the first one that improves the shifting seems to me like an extra layer of security and would be enough in master while the second fixes saving of some files and should go to 0.22 too. Agreed? (In reply to comment #3) > So i see this as two separate patches, the first one that improves the > shifting seems to me like an extra layer of security and would be enough in > master while the second fixes saving of some files and should go to 0.22 too. > > Agreed? Even if I don't think that shift(-1) delivers correct results in a binary stream and so it's not only an improvement, I agree to put it not into 0.22 because we don't have any bug reports which this would fix. So it's okay for me. Pushed |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.