Summary: | [IVB Bisected]I-G-T sysfs_rps Aborted | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | DRI | Reporter: | lu hua <huax.lu> |
Component: | DRM/Intel | Assignee: | Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala> |
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Severity: | major | ||
Priority: | high | CC: | mika.kuoppala, xunx.fang, yangweix.shui |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: |
Description
lu hua
2013-04-11 05:21:41 UTC
One for Ben! The patch changes the sysfs semantics for reading in /sys/class/drm/card0/gt_max_freq_mhz. The commit message also states this. Test assumes that reading gt_max_freq_mhz is the notion of current set maximum. I feel that we should retain the previous semantics and if need be, make a 'gt_max_oc_freq_mhz' as a read only sysfs entry. But I don't know the user case for these sysfs entries. Daniel, Ben, comments? Returning a different value than stored is a no-go. So this part needs to be reverted. If we want to show the overclock max somewhere then we need to add a new read-only sysfs file. Fix merged to dinq: commit e774f3082351b8f9cc87d89e7f2c70b2c67e6c3f Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu Apr 11 15:07:59 2013 +0300 drm/i915: Return stored value from max freq sysfs entry Verified. Fixed. Closing old verified. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.