Summary: | man page suffixes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | xorg | Reporter: | Jeremy C. Reed <reed> |
Component: | Build/Modular | Assignee: | Gaetan Nadon <memsize> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | QA Contact: | Xorg Project Team <xorg-team> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | high | CC: | jeremyhu |
Version: | 7.0.0 | ||
Hardware: | x86 (IA32) | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
Whiteboard: | 2011BRB_Reviewed | ||
i915 platform: | i915 features: |
Description
Jeremy C. Reed
2006-04-15 11:47:21 UTC
Changed the component to "modular build system". Problem is also in libXpm. I build and maintain packages for several operating systems with the desire that they have near same installations so admins and users can move between systems and have consistent environment. Sorry about the phenomenal bug spam, guys. Adding xorg-team@ to the QA contact so bugs don't get lost in future. Gaetan, was this cleaned up during the recent years of util-macros work? What I understand is the reporter wishes all platforms had the same man pages suffix. No doubt it would be preferable, however it is outside the scope of X.Org. First, we would have to adopt "a" standard to follow. Whatever man pages suffix we would follow, it would not be consistent with man pages from other projects. Perhaps there is a GNU or Posix standard, it would take some research. The suffix is set in util-macros.m4.in. I don't know where the .3x comes from. I noticed some distros/os change the suffix chosen by x.org at build time. Those who vary by platforms: if test x$FILE_MAN_SUFFIX = x ; then case $host_os in solaris*) FILE_MAN_SUFFIX=4 ;; *) FILE_MAN_SUFFIX=5 ;; esac fi if test x$MISC_MAN_SUFFIX = x ; then case $host_os in solaris*) MISC_MAN_SUFFIX=5 ;; *) MISC_MAN_SUFFIX=7 ;; esac fi if test x$DRIVER_MAN_SUFFIX = x ; then case $host_os in solaris*) DRIVER_MAN_SUFFIX=7 ;; *) DRIVER_MAN_SUFFIX=4 ;; esac fi if test x$ADMIN_MAN_SUFFIX = x ; then case $host_os in solaris*) ADMIN_MAN_SUFFIX=1m ;; *) ADMIN_MAN_SUFFIX=8 ;; esac fi |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.