Summary: | No mime type for OMF files | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | shared-mime-info | Reporter: | Ross Burton <ross> |
Component: | freedesktop.org.xml | Assignee: | Jonathan Blandford <jrb> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | high | CC: | bugzilla |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 (IA32) | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Attachments: | scrollkeeper.xml |
Description
Ross Burton
2004-06-02 20:48:21 UTC
Created attachment 364 [details] [review] scrollkeeper.xml Are omf files specific to scrollkeeper? If so, do you have any idea if the scrollkeeper maintainers could be convinced to register scrollkeeper mime types with shared-mime-info in their package? (sorry dudes, gratuitous test comment, please ignore) Comment on attachment 364 [details] [review] scrollkeeper.xml ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> ><mime-info xmlns="http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/shared-mime-info"> Don't make a separate file out of those types, they should be integrated in freedesktop.org.xml.in > <mime-type type="text/x-omf"> > <comment>Open Metadata Framework file</comment> mark those as translatable (_comment instead of comment), and make use of the acronym and expanded-acronym > <glob pattern="*.omf"/> Is there a magic for this mime-type? > </mime-type> ></mime-info> Given that scrollkeeper is the only application using those files, I'm not sure it's any use for us to have in shared-mime-info. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.