Summary: | [IVB/BDW bisected] GLBenchmark manhattan performance reduce by 20% with gnome-session | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Mesa | Reporter: | ye.tian <yex.tian> |
Component: | Drivers/DRI/i965 | Assignee: | Intel 3D Bugs Mailing List <intel-3d-bugs> |
Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | QA Contact: | Intel 3D Bugs Mailing List <intel-3d-bugs> |
Severity: | major | ||
Priority: | high | CC: | eero.t.tamminen, valtteri.rantala |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Attachments: | Xorg.0.log info |
Description
ye.tian
2015-02-02 07:40:59 UTC
Created attachment 113038 [details]
Xorg.0.log info
This bug also exists on BDW. I'm not able to reproduce this regression, for me fps is stable both with Topi's comment and current Mesa master (6094619), around ~40 on my machine (I cannot run on full HD due to display being 1600x900) (fedora 21, 3.17.8 kernel, X.org 1.14). Also, this particular commit cannot have any performance impact, it seems either bisect result is not correct or some other component is causing the regression. (In reply to Tapani Pälli from comment #4) > Also, this particular commit cannot have any performance impact, it seems > either bisect result is not correct or some other component is causing the > regression. Did you test the parents commit(604ae33c) of bisected bad commit(4c157d34)? Re-test results: resolution 1600x1200(not fullscreen) 1920x1080(fullscreen) parents commit(604ae33c) 31.5 fps 30.6 fps current Mesa master(6094619) 31.5 fps 24.5 fps Yep I've tested against parent and some older commits but I cannot seem to make the app fullscreen so that is quite a big difference here. I will try with some other machine. Eero, could you try to reproduce? I don't have any IVB machine. Valtteri said that he can check whether he sees a BDW regression in Manhattan in the same time frame. Ken, could you please take a look at this? I can't reproduce this either. I tried both current Mesa master (a338dc01866ce50bf7555ee8dc08491c7f63b585) and an older commit (fc6938d23e769497fd2acba7da0b59935ec9f1e4), and saw identical performance with each. This was on IVB (Lenovo X230) running X server master. I tried both xf86-video-modesetting+glamor+pageflipping and xf86-video-intel+sna. No changes at all. (In reply to Kenneth Graunke from comment #11) > This was on IVB (Lenovo X230) running X server master. I tried both > xf86-video-modesetting+glamor+pageflipping and xf86-video-intel+sna. No > changes at all. Oh, and this was at 1920x1080, fullscreen. Verified this bug with latest Mesa(master)2335153f. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.