Summary: | Missing newline in dbus_trace_ref verbose output | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | dbus | Reporter: | Ralf Habacker <ralf.habacker> |
Component: | core | Assignee: | D-Bus Maintainers <dbus> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | D-Bus Maintainers <dbus> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | Keywords: | patch |
Version: | 1.8 | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | review+ | ||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 90005 | ||
Attachments: |
Add newline to verbose output in _dbus_trace_ref().
Fix 'dbus connection referencing issue in test-relay'. |
Description
Ralf Habacker
2015-04-13 06:24:31 UTC
(In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #0) > The appended patch fixes this issue. You forgot to attach the patch? (In reply to Simon McVittie from comment #1) > (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #0) > > The appended patch fixes this issue. > > You forgot to attach the patch? Seems to be a bug in bugzilla :-( I added a patch on bug creation. Will readd later. Created attachment 115055 [details] [review] Add newline to verbose output in _dbus_trace_ref(). Created attachment 115056 [details] [review] Fix 'dbus connection referencing issue in test-relay'. Comment on attachment 115056 [details] [review] Fix 'dbus connection referencing issue in test-relay'. added to wrong bug :-( Comment on attachment 115055 [details] [review] Add newline to verbose output in _dbus_trace_ref(). Review of attachment 115055 [details] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Yes please! Comment on attachment 115055 [details] [review] Add newline to verbose output in _dbus_trace_ref(). committed to dbus-1.8 (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #7) > committed to dbus-1.8 This is such a trivial change that I'm probably not going to revert it, but in future please avoid committing stuff like this on stable-branches. Every change in a stable-branch is something that Linux distributions' QA people have to look at when deciding whether to approve a new version as "yes, this is a minimal fix"; and the more changes there are, the more likely they are to decide to do their own mini-fork of dbus instead, which hurts everyone in the long run. I would like change-averse distributions to be able to follow our stable branches. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.