Summary: | process-working has a blank frame | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | tango | Reporter: | Christian Persch (GNOME) <chpe> |
Component: | icon theme | Assignee: | Jakub Steiner <jimmac> |
Status: | RESOLVED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | CVS | ||
Hardware: | x86 (IA32) | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: |
Description
Christian Persch (GNOME)
2006-12-04 04:44:04 UTC
The name specification defines process-working to include the 'still' frame. Historically the GNOME side of things has been using a separate file for this (unlike KDE for example). If applications aim to support the naming scheme, they should follow the spec. * http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/icon-naming-spec-latest.html Well, Epiphany doesn't use "process-working", but "gnome-spinner". Since the specifications of these are incompatible, gnome-spinner should not be a symlink to process-working. Changing the system to the gnome way of things doesn't solve anything, just moves the problem to the KDE side. I don't see this as a problem with the specification nor the tango icon theme. I fixed epiphany to use the 0th frame as rest icon. However I still don't get why the frame is blank; shouldn't it be the 'clock' with all marks light-grey ? |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.