Summary: | fix compilation after recent rename | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | xorg | Reporter: | Benno Schulenberg <bensberg> | ||||
Component: | Driver/openchrome | Assignee: | Openchrome development list <openchrome-devel> | ||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | normal | ||||||
Priority: | medium | CC: | bensberg, kevinbrace | ||||
Version: | git | ||||||
Hardware: | Other | ||||||
OS: | All | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Benno Schulenberg
2016-03-22 12:59:57 UTC
(In reply to Benno Schulenberg from comment #0) Hi Benno, > Created attachment 122480 [details] [review] [review] > renames also the prototype > > When renaming UnmapMem to UnmapMMIO it was forgotten to rename also the > prototype in the header file. Attached patch fixes that. > > However, with that fix I still cannot compile openchrome. (I have started > using -Werror, to not allow any warnings to slip by unnoticed: export > CFLAGS="-g -O2 -Werror" && ./configure && make clean all). > > via_ums.c: In functie ‘ums_create’: > via_ums.c:657:11: fout: impliciete declaratie van functie > ‘xf86InitFBManager’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > ret = xf86InitFBManager(pScreen, &AvailFBArea); > ^ > via_ums.c:668:9: fout: impliciete declaratie van functie > ‘xf86InitFBManagerLinear’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > xf86InitFBManagerLinear(pScreen, offset, size); > > It seems some xf86 header include is missing. Thank you very much for catching my error. Due to some development issues, I still do not use Eclipse IDE for the master branch code I work on (I am using gedit right now.). If I were using Eclipse IDE, I would have caught this mistake since it does have a powerful keyword search feature, and I would have used it. In the near future, I will likely integrate my master branch code with Eclipse IDE after I make a commit related to the rewrite of standby resume code. After that one, I will commit your fix with the following section added after your Signed-off-by line. Acked-by: Kevin Brace <kevinbrace@gmx.com> I hope that is okay. (In reply to Kevin Brace from comment #1) > After that one, I will commit your fix with the following section added > after your Signed-off-by line. > > Acked-by: Kevin Brace <kevinbrace@gmx.com> > > I hope that is okay. That is perfectly fine. :) (In reply to Benno Schulenberg from comment #2) Hi Benno, > (In reply to Kevin Brace from comment #1) > > After that one, I will commit your fix with the following section added > > after your Signed-off-by line. > > > > Acked-by: Kevin Brace <kevinbrace@gmx.com> > > > > I hope that is okay. > > That is perfectly fine. :) Okay, I will apply your patch after I do a possible commit reversal. Basically, the code I removed will go back into the repository (I will not erase the history of the commit.), and then I will apply your patch for the commit. Fixed by commit 730ea106f21afe48e636d37125ff5afb7225a938. https://cgit.freedesktop.org/openchrome/xf86-video-openchrome/commit/?id=730ea106f21afe48e636d37125ff5afb7225a938 |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.