Summary: | Possible kernel regression for gen3 and earlier in i915.ko | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | DRI | Reporter: | Vivek Dasmohapatra <vivek> | ||||
Component: | DRM/Intel | Assignee: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> | ||||
Severity: | normal | ||||||
Priority: | medium | CC: | intel-gfx-bugs | ||||
Version: | unspecified | ||||||
Hardware: | x86 (IA32) | ||||||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
i915 platform: | I945GM | i915 features: | |||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Vivek Dasmohapatra
2016-03-23 20:34:26 UTC
Hi Vivek, there in the forum you told: "Great - I think I've found the commit that introduced the problem"... So it seems that your bisect found something... Although this atomic modeset changed a lot... Anyway, what did your bisect tell you? What was the first bad commit? (In reply to Rodrigo Vivi from comment #1) I think I thought it was b70709a6f0e9176c2bc7ecf44acf015c7362ddc6 but too much had changed for me to see if that was actually the case: I looked at the more recent commits and it looks like 634b3a4a476e96816d5d6cd5bb9f8900a53f56ba fixes at least the first part of the problem (plan_mask not being set yet when …sanitize_crtc is called). Ok, confirmed that 634b3a4a476e96816d5d6cd5bb9f8900a53f56ba fixes the initial sanitize_crtc problem. The problem with drm_atomic_commit first called from intel_get_load_detect_pipe() but called from other places too ending up in the no mode_blob error path is stil there. Presumed fixed then, please reopen if the problem persists with latest kernels. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.