Bug 95382

Summary: [BAT BYT BSW] gem_exec_flush@basic-uc-pro-default test fails
Product: DRI Reporter: Daniela Prodan <daniela.doras-prodan>
Component: DRM/IntelAssignee: Chris Wilson <chris>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs>
Severity: critical    
Priority: medium CC: intel-gfx-bugs
Version: DRI git   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux (All)   
Whiteboard:
i915 platform: BSW/CHT, BYT i915 features: GEM/Other
Attachments:
Description Flags
dmesg fi-bsw-n3050
none
dmesg fi-byt-n2820
none
dmesg ro-bsw-n3050
none
dmesg ro-byt-n2820 none

Description Daniela Prodan 2016-05-13 12:33:59 UTC
gem_exec_flush@basic-uc-pro-default test is failing for several DRM builds on BYT and BSW.

/archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_CI_DRM_369/fi-byt-n2820/html/fi-byt-n2820@RO_CI_DRM_369@1/igt@gem_exec_flush@basic-uc-pro-default.html

/archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_CI_DRM_369/ro-byt-n2820/html/ro-byt-n2820@RO_CI_DRM_369@1/igt@gem_exec_flush@basic-uc-pro-default.html

/archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_CI_DRM_369/fi-bsw-n3050/html/fi-bsw-n3050@RO_CI_DRM_369@1/igt@gem_exec_flush@basic-uc-pro-default.html

/archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_CI_DRM_369/ro-bsw-n3050/html/ro-bsw-n3050@RO_CI_DRM_369@1/igt@gem_exec_flush@basic-uc-pro-default.html


On byt:
(gem_exec_flush:6105) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function run, file gem_exec_flush.c:241:
(gem_exec_flush:6105) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: val == i
(gem_exec_flush:6105) CRITICAL: error: 0xabcdabcd != 0x280
(gem_exec_flush:6104) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function run, file gem_exec_flush.c:239:
(gem_exec_flush:6104) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: val == i ^ 0xffffffff
(gem_exec_flush:6104) CRITICAL: error: 0xfffffc10 != 0xfffffcef
Subtest basic-uc-pro-default failed.
No log.

On BSW:
	
(gem_exec_flush:7727) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function run, file gem_exec_flush.c:241:
(gem_exec_flush:7727) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: val == i
(gem_exec_flush:7727) CRITICAL: error: 0xcd != 0x50
Subtest basic-uc-pro-default failed.
No log.
Comment 1 Daniela Prodan 2016-05-13 12:35:27 UTC
Created attachment 123675 [details]
dmesg fi-bsw-n3050
Comment 2 Daniela Prodan 2016-05-13 12:35:58 UTC
Created attachment 123676 [details]
dmesg fi-byt-n2820
Comment 3 Daniela Prodan 2016-05-13 12:36:35 UTC
Created attachment 123677 [details]
dmesg ro-bsw-n3050
Comment 4 Daniela Prodan 2016-05-13 12:37:04 UTC
Created attachment 123678 [details]
dmesg ro-byt-n2820
Comment 5 cprigent 2016-05-18 12:47:25 UTC
Same as bug 95378 ?
Comment 6 Chris Wilson 2016-05-18 13:02:59 UTC
(In reply to cprigent from comment #5)
> Same as bug 95378 ?

No.
Comment 7 Chris Wilson 2016-07-13 08:28:19 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 92845 ***

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.