Summary: | Lenovo Yoga X1 touchpad unprecise | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Wayland | Reporter: | bjoern <wilecoyote2015> |
Component: | libinput | Assignee: | Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | CC: | peter.hutterer |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86-64 (AMD64) | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Bug Depends on: | 98839 | ||
Bug Blocks: | |||
Attachments: |
Attempt to draw a circle
0001-evdev-change-hysteresis-to-work-across-both-axes.patch |
Description
bjoern
2017-01-14 19:33:32 UTC
I must add as a third point that the acceleration behavior at low speeds is also problematic: If the finger is moved very slowly, there is a treshold of a few millimeters until the cursor starts moving. When moving a bit faster, the relation between finger movement speed and cursor movement is linear for very small velocities, but then acceleration punches in very abruptly. This all leads to a significant loss of control when working on small distances (like setting the cursor position accurately while editing texts or performing image editing). what version of libinput do you have? the 1.6rc1/git master have a better acceleration than previous versions. Also, please make sure that the touchpad-edge-detector tool agrees with what your touchpad announces. Sometimes if the whole thing is a few mm offset it can make the touchpad behave quite differently Thank you, Peter. I have checked the axes according to https://wayland.freedesktop.org/libinput/doc/latest/absolute_coordinate_ranges.html and indeed, the physical dimension reported by the kernel were incorrect and I have opened a pull request at systemd. However, after testing the updated evdev rule locally, the problems described in this bug report remain. I am using today's GIT master compiled from Arch User Repository Best Regards, Bjoern Created attachment 128997 [details]
Attempt to draw a circle
In order to illustrate issue 2), this is the result of drawing with spiral-like finger movements.
Hello, I have investigated the issue a bit further: When Evdev is used as driver instead of libinput, Issue 1 is completely gone. Issue two and three seem so be related: Using xev On each axis independently, with both libinput and evdev, on each axis a certain threshold of some millimeters must be exceeded in order to start a motion. So when the finger is resting and a slow motion is started, no changes of positions are reported to xev over the first few millimeters. Also, when moving the finger along only one axis a first and then beginning a curved motion so that there is a change of position on axis b, too, changes of axis b are only reported after the change in axis b exceeds a certain threshold. This makes it very hard to predict motion and makes the touchpad feel rather unprecise. As the previously attached image demonstrates, it is hard to conduct controlled movements. I have tried to set the Synaptics Noise Cancellation parameter to 0, 0 and the issue is gone completely. The touchpad is very precise now. Disabling the noise cancellation that way did not introduce negative side effects to me because the touchpad does not seem to be prone to input noise at all. Ok, this is related to bug 98839 then. Bugzilla doesn't have a "related" field, so I'll just add it as a blocker here. ok, I've done an analysis on my T450p which in theory has the same touchpad as the X1 Yoga. Please attach your dmesg and an evemu-record sequence of such a circle though so I can verify a few things. What I found in regards to issue 2 on my touchpad here: Moving diagonally produces a wavy motion. I can't quite reproduce the circle here, can you reproduce the wavy motion? On my device, this is caused by the problem described here: https://who-t.blogspot.com.au/2016/09/libinput-and-lenovo-t450-and-t460.html That wavy motion *may* exist on my T440 as well, but it's unclear whether there it is caused by my finger motion or any other issue. Either way, the same code and such a pronounced difference hints at a HW/FW bug, see the blog post. Changing the hysteresis did not have any effect. The hysteresis is done on a per-axis basis, this could cause the issue you're seeing. That removing the hysteresis removes the issue verifies this. Right now I'm assuming that the latest touchpads have a new FW version again that prevents that bug in the T450p series. Please remove the call to tp_motion_hysteresis() in libinput's src/evdev-mt-touchpad.c and try with that version. The diff is: diff --git a/src/evdev-mt-touchpad.c b/src/evdev-mt-touchpad.c index e43a9ba..4bac610 100644 --- a/src/evdev-mt-touchpad.c +++ b/src/evdev-mt-touchpad.c @@ -1037,7 +1037,6 @@ tp_process_state(struct tp_dispatch *tp, uint64_t time) tp_thumb_detect(tp, t, time); tp_palm_detect(tp, t, time); - tp_motion_hysteresis(tp, t); tp_motion_history_push(t); tp_unpin_finger(tp, t); If this works, we'll probably need a two-pronged approach: make the hysteresis work across both axes simultaneously and have some knob that exposes it, see bug 98839. Removing the hysteresis altogether does not work, see 48473994c8e60 and bug 94379. I haven't looked at the pointer acceleration issue (1) yet. Created attachment 129267 [details] [review] 0001-evdev-change-hysteresis-to-work-across-both-axes.patch Please give this one a try. It removes the axis snapping you've been seeing but still keeps the hysteresis in place. So there is still a dead zone on initial finger movement but with the axis snapping gone it may not be as problematic anymore. can you try the patch please? a month in needinfo, can't fix things without feedback. Hello all, sorry for the long abscence; life is keeping me quite busy. I will be able to test it in the end of july. Currently, my Notebook is important for day-to-day use. Best regards Hello! Finally, I have had some time to try the patch out. Unfortunately, although it reduces the tolerance to start motion, it also causes very jittery pointer motion, so that this configuration is not usable at all. The issue is gone with the resolution of Bug 98839, so this issue is fixed. Thanke! oh, glad to hear that, thanks for testing! Hello, unfortunately, the issue occurs again for some time. Has the automatic disabling of hysteresis been removed? Yeah, it's been replaced with an approach where the hysteresis is (should be) off by default but it detects wobbles. See Bug 104828 please test libinput 1.11rc1 or later, that should have all the latest code. By default, no hysteresis is applied unless the device has an axis fuzz set. There's code to detect axis jitter in most cases and enable it on the fly, so far this code seems to have been working well. I'm assuming this is all fixed now, if not please attach an evemu-record with a sequence that reproduces the issue. Hello, I've tested with git master now and I can confirm tbat the issue is fixed. Best, Björn thanks, much appreciated |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.