Bug 39523 - Merge menu items in Impress
Summary: Merge menu items in Impress
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Presentation (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
QA Contact: QA Administrators
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-07-25 06:23 UTC by Leif Lodahl
Modified: 2013-06-04 16:57 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments

Description Leif Lodahl 2011-07-25 06:23:31 UTC
The menu items "Insert - Page number..." (InsertPageNumber) and "Insert - Date and Time..." (InsertDateAndTime) is both pointing to the same dialog: "Header and Footer".

These two menu items should be merged into one: "Insert - Footer elements".
Comment 1 Björn Michaelsen 2011-12-23 12:27:51 UTC
[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is
changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back
to NEW please check if the bug still persists with the 3.5.0 beta1 or beta2 prereleases.
Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1

more detail on this bulk operation: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RFC-Operation-Spamzilla-tp3607474p3607474.html
Comment 2 Leif Lodahl 2011-12-27 14:06:43 UTC
Still relevant.
Not actually a bug but more an easy improvement to the user interface. One dialog with three different things to insert has two entries in the "insert" menu.
Comment 3 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:03:22 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 4 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:04:17 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 5 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:08:49 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 6 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:10:50 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 7 Björn Michaelsen 2012-08-15 20:13:52 UTC
I wonder why this wasnt set back to NEW along with the reasoning in Comment 2 as was suggested in Comment 1. Anyway reopening.

CCing Astron, just to quickly check back, if there are any hidden concerns from the UX perspective. Otherwise I would think this would even qualify as a wonderful EasyHack.
Comment 8 Stefan Knorr (astron) 2012-08-15 21:27:17 UTC
Hi there.
I almost think that's fine as it is today, as users will not be searching for (random) "footer elements" – they will be searching for how to insert slide numbers and the time and date.
Unless we can word that significantly better than "footer elements," I'd vote to keep the current version. Even if it's odd that both entries open the same dialogue on the same page.
Comment 9 Michael Meeks 2012-08-16 16:38:47 UTC
So - perhaps in other languages there is some intuitive word that people will immediately see and act on that works better than English.

If so - I guess we could try to identify such languages and adapt the UI in some way - but that's real work.

Leif - I tend to agree with Astron; what's your take ?
Comment 10 Leif Lodahl 2012-08-16 19:36:59 UTC
Disagree.
We should try to make the user interface more simple - not more complicated. I don't know of other situations where we have dual menu items to the same function. 

But we should of cause find other expressions. I originally suggested "Insert - Footer elements" but I'm open to suggestions here ;-)

Should we call for the cavalry (Design/UX-guys)?


Cheers,
Leif
Comment 11 sasha.libreoffice 2012-09-29 07:13:01 UTC
What is interesting: in msPP 2003 done exactly the same: two menu items point to the same dialog. Therefore this done for compatibility with PP.
Comment 12 QA Administrators 2013-05-29 23:04:55 UTC
Dear Bug Submitter,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INVALID due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: 
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FDO/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed.


Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!


Warm Regards,
QA Team
Comment 13 Florian Reisinger 2013-05-30 06:15:31 UTC
Should be NEW #7
Comment 14 Leif Lodahl 2013-05-30 07:51:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #11)
> What is interesting: in msPP 2003 done exactly the same: two menu items
> point to the same dialog. Therefore this done for compatibility with PP.
That is not a valid reason. We should not replikate all MS mistakes for /compatibility reasons/.

I rest my case and give up.
But I still think that we should make our GUI as simple as possible and not more complex than necessary.

Cheers,
Leif
Comment 15 Stefan Knorr (astron) 2013-06-04 16:57:13 UTC
Leif, the problem is your suggested wording. "Footer elements" sounds like all or nothing. "Date and Time" and "Page Number" mean something to users.

I admit, I didn't think too hard about this, but I couldn't come up with a better solution.

And you should have seen my mother's look when I told her that adding a page number to a Writer document entails going to a sub-menu called Fields (although, in my native German, it is actually worse; it's Feldbefehle, i.e. Field Commands there).


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.