Summary: | [CI] - igt@* - dmesg-warn - *ERROR* Link Training Unsuccessful | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | DRI | Reporter: | Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt> |
Component: | DRM/Intel | Assignee: | shashank.sharma <shashank.sharma> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Severity: | critical | ||
Priority: | highest | CC: | intel-gfx-bugs |
Version: | DRI git | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | ReadyForDev | ||
i915 platform: | KBL | i915 features: | display/Other |
Description
Marta Löfstedt
2017-10-16 06:39:24 UTC
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3229/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_rotation_crc@sprite-rotation-270.html [ 283.838139] [drm:intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values [i915]] *ERROR* Link Training Unsuccessful [ 284.271625] [drm] Atomic update on pipe (A) took 284 us, max time under evasion is 250 us [ 284.701592] [drm] Atomic update on pipe (A) took 306 us, max time under evasion is 250 us [ 285.263078] [drm:intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values [i915]] *ERROR* Link Training Unsuccessful [ 285.569340] [drm:intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values [i915]] *ERROR* Link Training Unsuccessful [ 286.139792] [drm:intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values [i915]] *ERROR* Link Training Unsuccessful [ 286.411885] [drm] Atomic update on pipe (B) took 307 us, max time under evasion is 250 us [ 286.849299] [drm:intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values [i915]] *ERROR* Link Training Unsuccessful [ 287.159871] [drm:intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values [i915]] *ERROR* Link Training Unsuccessful [ 287.452562] [drm] Atomic update on pipe (C) took 278 us, max time under evasion is 250 us [ 287.729101] [drm:intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values [i915]] *ERROR* Link Training Unsuccessful [ 288.644852] [drm:intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values [i915]] *ERROR* Link Training Unsuccessful https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3229/shard-kbl7/igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip.html Note: I am not linking all occurances by I will try a couple of new subtests each day. https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3244/shard-kbl6/igt@pm_rpm@reg-read-ioctl.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3244/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_chv_cursor_fail@pipe-A-256x256-left-edge.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3244/shard-kbl6/igt@pm_rpm@sysfs-read.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3244/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-ts-check.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3244/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_addfb_basic@too-wide.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3244/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_color@ctm-negative-pipe1.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3244/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_chv_cursor_fail@pipe-C-64x64-left-edge.html Here is maybe an interesting observation. This show all the times we have hit the issue: http://benchsrv.fi.intel.com/cibuglog/?action_failures_history=399 for CI_DRM_3256 all occurrences are from shards-kbl2. I am not saying that there is something particularly wrong with that machine. Which is clearly visible by looking at other runs. There has been no linktraining issues on the KBL-shards since CI_DRM_3291 until CI_DRM_3304. So, it appear as if: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3292/commits_short.log d0582552491e drm-tip: 2017y-10m-27d-19h-16m-21s UTC integration manifest be33be5df2a0 drm/i915: Clean up the mess around hdmi_12bpc_possible() 857c416e58dc drm/i915: Improve DP downstream HPD handling 5161d058dff4 drm/i915: Fix BXT lane latency optimal setting with MST 742745f1ee4f drm/i915: Stop using encoder->type in intel_ddi_enable_transcoder_func() f49b44ab8403 drm/i915: Start using output_types for DPLL selection 3a6d84e677d4 drm/i915: Pass crtc state to intel_prepare_dp_ddi_buffers() 5448f53ffe62 drm/i915: Don't use encoder->type in intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings() 4efa63085536 drm-tip: 2017y-10m-27d-15h-25m-04s UTC integration manifest unintentionally fixed something. IGT-Version: 1.20-g1fc4de1c for both CI_DRM_3291 and CI_DRM_3292. I will close this bug. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.