Summary: | [CI][BAT] igt@gem_tiled_blits@basic - fail - Failed assertion: num_errors == 0, error: 626 != 0 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | DRI | Reporter: | Lakshmi <lakshminarayana.vudum> |
Component: | DRM/Intel | Assignee: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | high | CC: | intel-gfx-bugs |
Version: | DRI git | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | ReadyForDev | ||
i915 platform: | ICL | i915 features: | GEM/Other |
Description
Lakshmi
2019-04-05 05:51:48 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated. ### New filters associated * ICL: igt@gem_tiled_blits@basic - fail - Failed assertion: num_errors == 0, error: 626 != 0 - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4929/fi-icl-y/igt@gem_tiled_blits@basic.html That casts aspersions on the HW. As Chris says above, we suspect pre-prod HW flakyness to be the culprit. If it will happen consistently it could be a more serious issue, but the only way to know is wait and see. Meanwhile, I suggest that we lower the priority to max "high", or just live with the fact that you are not going to get daily updates on this one :) A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: {- ICL: igt@gem_tiled_blits@basic - fail - Failed assertion: num_errors == 0, error: 626 != 0 -} {+ ICL: igt@gem_tiled_blits@basic - fail - Failed assertion: num_errors == 0, error: \d+ != 0 +} No new failures caught with the new filter (In reply to Francesco Balestrieri from comment #4) > Meanwhile, I suggest that we lower the priority to max "high", or just live > with the fact that you are not going to get daily updates on this one :) Agree with you. Setting it high priority. Still seen only once. One occurrence in almost two months, closing. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.