Bug 111646

Summary:	[CI][RESUME] igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-* - fail - Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0, error: -110 != 0
Product:	DRI	Reporter:	Martin Peres <martin.peres>
Component:	DRM/Intel	Assignee:	Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs>
Status:	RESOLVED MOVED	QA Contact:	Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs>
Severity:	not set
Priority:	high	CC:	intel-gfx-bugs, lakshminarayana.vudum
Version:	XOrg git
Hardware:	Other
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
i915 platform:	BXT, CFL, CML, GLK, KBL, SKL, TGL	i915 features:	GEM/Other
Bug Depends on:	111880
Bug Blocks:

Description Martin Peres 2019-09-11 07:42:47 UTC

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_364/fi-tgl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-bsd2.html

Starting subtest: deep-bsd2
(gem_exec_schedule:2746) igt_vgem-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function vgem_fence_signal, file ../lib/igt_vgem.c:193:
(gem_exec_schedule:2746) igt_vgem-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0
(gem_exec_schedule:2746) igt_vgem-CRITICAL: error: -110 != 0

Comment 1 CI Bug Log 2019-09-11 07:43:13 UTC

The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* TGL: igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-* - fail - Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0, error: -110 != 0
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_362/fi-tgl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-render.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_363/fi-tgl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-bsd2.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14335/re-tgl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_363/fi-tgl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-bsd1.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_364/fi-tgl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-bsd2.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_364/fi-tgl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_364/fi-tgl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-bsd1.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_364/fi-tgl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-render.html

Comment 2 Chris Wilson 2019-09-11 07:53:52 UTC

Of the few remaining vgem fences in here, you had to go and hit it. This is likely just because tgl is not using rps yet and so is too slow.

Comment 3 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-09-27 05:39:49 UTC

Chris, is there a bug about RPS being disabled? IF not, should there be one?

Comment 4 Chris Wilson 2019-09-27 10:16:34 UTC

(In reply to Francesco Balestrieri from comment #3)
> Chris, is there a bug about RPS being disabled? IF not, should there be one?

Bug 111650 is rps not being responsive; now we have it currently disabled to reduced the number of tgl lockups.

Comment 5 Chris Wilson 2019-10-08 21:05:56 UTC

*** Bug 111929 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 CI Bug Log 2019-10-09 08:09:11 UTC

The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* TGL: igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-render - fail - Failed assertion: read_buf[n] == ctx[n % 1024]
  (No new failures associated)

Comment 7 CI Bug Log 2019-10-16 09:28:36 UTC

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

{- TGL: igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-* - fail - Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0, error: -110 != 0 -}
{+ TGL: igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-* - fail - Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0, error: -110 != 0 +}

New failures caught by the filter:

  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7093/re-tgl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-bsd1.html

Comment 8 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-11-11 09:41:41 UTC

Marking as blocked by Bug 111880 since RPS won't likely be enabled until that is fixed.

Comment 9 CI Bug Log 2019-11-15 06:48:05 UTC

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

{- TGL: igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-* - fail - Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0, error: -110 != 0 -}
{+ APL SKL KBL GLK TGL: igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-* - fail - Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0, error: -110 != 0 +}

New failures caught by the filter:

  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7340/shard-apl2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7340/shard-glk3/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7340/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7340/shard-skl8/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7341/shard-apl7/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7341/shard-glk2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7341/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7341/shard-skl6/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7342/shard-apl2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7342/shard-glk4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7342/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7342/shard-skl2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5280/shard-apl7/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5280/shard-glk5/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5280/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5280/shard-skl3/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html

Comment 10 CI Bug Log 2019-11-20 11:08:51 UTC

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

{- APL SKL KBL GLK TGL: igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-* - fail - Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0, error: -110 != 0 -}
{+ APL BXT SKL KBL GLK TGL: igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-* - fail - Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0, error: -110 != 0 +}

New failures caught by the filter:

  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_405/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_406/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_407/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html

Comment 11 CI Bug Log 2019-11-20 11:21:55 UTC

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

{- APL BXT SKL KBL GLK TGL: igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-* - fail - Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0, error: -110 != 0 -}
{+ APL BXT SKL KBL GLK CFL TGL: igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-* - fail - Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0, error: -110 != 0 +}

New failures caught by the filter:

  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-cfl-guc/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_405/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_405/fi-cfl-guc/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_406/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_406/fi-cfl-guc/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_407/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_407/fi-cfl-guc/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html

Comment 12 CI Bug Log 2019-11-20 11:37:46 UTC

A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

{- APL BXT SKL KBL GLK CFL TGL: igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-* - fail - Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0, error: -110 != 0 -}
{+ APL BXT SKL KBL GLK WHL CFL CML TGL: igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-* - fail - Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0, error: -110 != 0 +}

New failures caught by the filter:

  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-cml-u2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-whl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_405/fi-cml-s/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_405/fi-cml-u2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_405/fi-whl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_406/fi-cml-u2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_406/fi-whl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_407/fi-cml-u2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html
  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_407/fi-whl-u/igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-blt.html

Comment 13 Martin Peres 2019-11-29 19:27:53 UTC

-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --

This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity.

You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/412.

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.