Bug 111798

Summary: [CI][DRMTIP] [byt iommu?] igt@gem_wait@wait-bcs0 - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_wait(fd, &wait) == 0
Product: DRI Reporter: Lakshmi <lakshminarayana.vudum>
Component: DRM/IntelAssignee: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED MOVED QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs>
Severity: minor    
Priority: low CC: intel-gfx-bugs
Version: DRI git   
Hardware: Other   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
i915 platform: BYT i915 features: GEM/Other

Description Lakshmi 2019-09-24 07:33:58 UTC
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_375/fi-byt-n2820/igt@gem_wait@wait-bcs0.html
Starting subtest: wait-bcs0
(gem_wait:1105) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function basic, file ../tests/i915/gem_wait.c:117:
(gem_wait:1105) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __gem_wait(fd, &wait) == 0
(gem_wait:1105) CRITICAL: Last errno: 62, Timer expired
(gem_wait:1105) CRITICAL: error: -62 != 0
Subtest wait-bcs0 failed.
Comment 1 CI Bug Log 2019-09-24 07:36:55 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* BYT: igt@gem_wait@wait-bcs0 - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_wait(fd, &amp;wait) == 0
  (No new failures associated)
Comment 2 Chris Wilson 2019-09-24 07:37:54 UTC
<7> [508.184259] __intel_gt_set_wedged bcs0
<7> [508.184277] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	Awake? 2
<7> [508.184294] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	Hangcheck: 1471 ms ago
<7> [508.184311] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	Reset count: 0 (global 12)
<7> [508.184327] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	Requests:
<7> [508.184352] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	MMIO base:  0x00022000
<7> [508.184418] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	RING_START: 0x007f1000
<7> [508.184444] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	RING_HEAD:  0x00002d38
<7> [508.184469] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	RING_TAIL:  0x000030e8
<7> [508.184503] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	RING_CTL:   0x00003001
<7> [508.184536] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	RING_MODE:  0x00000000
<7> [508.184560] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	RING_IMR: ffbfffff
<7> [508.184585] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	ACTHD:  0x00000000_b7e0784c
<7> [508.184617] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	BBADDR: 0x00000000_b7e0b7c9
<7> [508.184642] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	DMA_FADDR: 0x00000000_b7e0ea00
<7> [508.184666] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	IPEIR: 0x00000008
<7> [508.184802] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	IPEHR: 0x00000000
<7> [508.184830] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	PP_DIR_BASE: 0x7fdf0000
<7> [508.184855] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	PP_DIR_BASE_READ: 0x00000000
<7> [508.184886] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	PP_DIR_DCLV: 0xffffffff
<7> [508.185086] __intel_gt_set_wedged 		E  5:fb7-  @ 1868ms: gem_wait[1105]
<7> [508.185313] __intel_gt_set_wedged HWSP:
<7> [508.185337] __intel_gt_set_wedged [0000] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
<7> [508.185353] __intel_gt_set_wedged *
<7> [508.185376] __intel_gt_set_wedged [0100] 00000fb5 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
<7> [508.185398] __intel_gt_set_wedged [0120] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
<7> [508.185414] __intel_gt_set_wedged *
<7> [508.185459] __intel_gt_set_wedged Idle? no
<7> [508.185476] __intel_gt_set_wedged Signals:
<7> [508.185606] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	[5:fb7] @ 1868ms

that looks like the classic jump into scratch and execute the entirety of the empty GTT. What's changed? iommu!
Comment 3 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-10-10 06:22:08 UTC
CI Buglog says 0/0 occurrences (!). Setting severity to minor.
Comment 4 Martin Peres 2019-11-29 19:34:07 UTC
-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --

This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity.

You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/448.

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.