Bug 111798 - [CI][DRMTIP] [byt iommu?] igt@gem_wait@wait-bcs0 - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_wait(fd, &wait) == 0
Summary: [CI][DRMTIP] [byt iommu?] igt@gem_wait@wait-bcs0 - fail - Failed assertion: _...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Intel (show other bugs)
Version: DRI git
Hardware: Other All
: low minor
Assignee: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-09-24 07:33 UTC by Lakshmi
Modified: 2019-10-10 06:22 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform: BYT
i915 features: GEM/Other


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lakshmi 2019-09-24 07:33:58 UTC
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_375/fi-byt-n2820/igt@gem_wait@wait-bcs0.html
Starting subtest: wait-bcs0
(gem_wait:1105) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function basic, file ../tests/i915/gem_wait.c:117:
(gem_wait:1105) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __gem_wait(fd, &wait) == 0
(gem_wait:1105) CRITICAL: Last errno: 62, Timer expired
(gem_wait:1105) CRITICAL: error: -62 != 0
Subtest wait-bcs0 failed.
Comment 1 CI Bug Log 2019-09-24 07:36:55 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* BYT: igt@gem_wait@wait-bcs0 - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_wait(fd, &wait) == 0
  (No new failures associated)
Comment 2 Chris Wilson 2019-09-24 07:37:54 UTC
<7> [508.184259] __intel_gt_set_wedged bcs0
<7> [508.184277] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	Awake? 2
<7> [508.184294] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	Hangcheck: 1471 ms ago
<7> [508.184311] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	Reset count: 0 (global 12)
<7> [508.184327] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	Requests:
<7> [508.184352] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	MMIO base:  0x00022000
<7> [508.184418] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	RING_START: 0x007f1000
<7> [508.184444] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	RING_HEAD:  0x00002d38
<7> [508.184469] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	RING_TAIL:  0x000030e8
<7> [508.184503] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	RING_CTL:   0x00003001
<7> [508.184536] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	RING_MODE:  0x00000000
<7> [508.184560] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	RING_IMR: ffbfffff
<7> [508.184585] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	ACTHD:  0x00000000_b7e0784c
<7> [508.184617] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	BBADDR: 0x00000000_b7e0b7c9
<7> [508.184642] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	DMA_FADDR: 0x00000000_b7e0ea00
<7> [508.184666] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	IPEIR: 0x00000008
<7> [508.184802] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	IPEHR: 0x00000000
<7> [508.184830] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	PP_DIR_BASE: 0x7fdf0000
<7> [508.184855] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	PP_DIR_BASE_READ: 0x00000000
<7> [508.184886] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	PP_DIR_DCLV: 0xffffffff
<7> [508.185086] __intel_gt_set_wedged 		E  5:fb7-  @ 1868ms: gem_wait[1105]
<7> [508.185313] __intel_gt_set_wedged HWSP:
<7> [508.185337] __intel_gt_set_wedged [0000] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
<7> [508.185353] __intel_gt_set_wedged *
<7> [508.185376] __intel_gt_set_wedged [0100] 00000fb5 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
<7> [508.185398] __intel_gt_set_wedged [0120] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
<7> [508.185414] __intel_gt_set_wedged *
<7> [508.185459] __intel_gt_set_wedged Idle? no
<7> [508.185476] __intel_gt_set_wedged Signals:
<7> [508.185606] __intel_gt_set_wedged 	[5:fb7] @ 1868ms

that looks like the classic jump into scratch and execute the entirety of the empty GTT. What's changed? iommu!
Comment 3 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-10-10 06:22:08 UTC
CI Buglog says 0/0 occurrences (!). Setting severity to minor.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.