Bug 112287

Summary:	[CI][RESUME]igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-shared-gtt-render - fail - Failed assertion: *s == 0xc0ffee
Product:	DRI	Reporter:	Lakshmi <lakshminarayana.vudum>
Component:	DRM/Intel	Assignee:	Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs>
Status:	RESOLVED MOVED	QA Contact:	Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs>
Severity:	minor
Priority:	medium	CC:	intel-gfx-bugs
Version:	DRI git
Hardware:	Other
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
i915 platform:	TGL	i915 features:	GEM/Other

Description Lakshmi 2019-11-14 16:48:20 UTC

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7325/re-tgl-u/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-shared-gtt-render.html
Starting subtest: exec-shared-gtt-render
(gem_ctx_shared:1962) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function exec_shared_gtt, file ../tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c:272:
(gem_ctx_shared:1962) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: *s == 0xc0ffee
(gem_ctx_shared:1962) CRITICAL: error: 0x5000000 != 0xc0ffee
Subtest exec-shared-gtt-render failed.

Comment 1 CI Bug Log 2019-11-14 16:49:09 UTC

The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* TGL: igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-shared-gtt-render - fail - Failed assertion: *s == 0xc0ffee
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7325/re-tgl-u/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-shared-gtt-render.html

Comment 2 Chris Wilson 2019-11-14 23:36:18 UTC

Worst case, our invalidation is not strong enough for the vm switch. Best case, this is just another tgl mystery fail.

Comment 3 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-11-27 08:12:31 UTC

Seen once so far.

Comment 4 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-11-27 08:13:34 UTC

Setting to NEEDINFO while waiting to see if it happens again.

Comment 5 Martin Peres 2019-11-29 19:47:55 UTC

-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --

This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity.

You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/607.

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.