Bug 112287 - [CI][RESUME]igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-shared-gtt-render - fail - Failed assertion: *s == 0xc0ffee
Summary: [CI][RESUME]igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-shared-gtt-render - fail - Failed asserti...
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Intel (show other bugs)
Version: DRI git
Hardware: Other All
: medium minor
Assignee: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
Depends on:
Reported: 2019-11-14 16:48 UTC by Lakshmi
Modified: 2019-11-29 19:47 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform: TGL
i915 features: GEM/Other


Description Lakshmi 2019-11-14 16:48:20 UTC
Starting subtest: exec-shared-gtt-render
(gem_ctx_shared:1962) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function exec_shared_gtt, file ../tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c:272:
(gem_ctx_shared:1962) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: *s == 0xc0ffee
(gem_ctx_shared:1962) CRITICAL: error: 0x5000000 != 0xc0ffee
Subtest exec-shared-gtt-render failed.
Comment 1 CI Bug Log 2019-11-14 16:49:09 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* TGL: igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-shared-gtt-render - fail - Failed assertion: *s == 0xc0ffee
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7325/re-tgl-u/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-shared-gtt-render.html
Comment 2 Chris Wilson 2019-11-14 23:36:18 UTC
Worst case, our invalidation is not strong enough for the vm switch. Best case, this is just another tgl mystery fail.
Comment 3 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-11-27 08:12:31 UTC
Seen once so far.
Comment 4 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-11-27 08:13:34 UTC
Setting to NEEDINFO while waiting to see if it happens again.
Comment 5 Martin Peres 2019-11-29 19:47:55 UTC
-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --

This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity.

You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/607.

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.