Summary: | [Nvidia/nv] Updated nVidia driver for Xorg | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | xorg | Reporter: | Jim Huang <jserv> | ||||
Component: | Driver/nVidia (open) | Assignee: | Xorg Project Team <xorg-team> | ||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | normal | ||||||
Priority: | high | CC: | alan.coopersmith, andrew.grover, dberkholz, mharris, moz | ||||
Version: | unspecified | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Jim Huang
2004-09-30 01:44:52 UTC
Created attachment 984 [details]
Updated nv driver for Xorg
*** Bug 1431 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Where did this code originate? Jim can we get an answer to Mike's question and get moving on getting this in? I have a Quadro 1300 which is slowly becoming obsolete, while this patch waits in limbo. How does this compare to the already completed merge of nv driver updates from Mark Vojkovich which is in CVS head & the 6.8.2 branch from bug id #1777? I don't know the code intimately but they look 99% the same. However, bug 1777's patch omits the one line I care about: + { 0x10DE00FE, "Quadro FX 1300" }, Put that in and I'm happy. This was superceded by later Xorg merges. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.