Summary: | xf86-input-mouse 1.6.99 broken on BSD systems | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | xorg | Reporter: | Matthieu Herrb <matthieu.herrb> | ||||||||||||
Component: | Input/Mouse | Assignee: | Xorg Project Team <xorg-team> | ||||||||||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Xorg Project Team <xorg-team> | ||||||||||||
Severity: | blocker | ||||||||||||||
Priority: | medium | CC: | peter.hutterer | ||||||||||||
Version: | git | ||||||||||||||
Hardware: | x86 (IA32) | ||||||||||||||
OS: | OpenBSD | ||||||||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||||||||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||||||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Matthieu Herrb
2011-02-27 07:48:00 UTC
Created attachment 43898 [details] [review] Fix patch Try this patch, it must fix (In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=43898) [details] > Fix patch > > Try this patch, it must fix Yes it fixes the issue. However I think that for the long term a better solution is needed: - treat the wsmouse protocol as a 1st class protocol in mouse.c - review and remove code duplication between the OS PreInit code and the generic one. Created attachment 44158 [details] [review] ver 2 Review of attachment 44158 [details] [review]: I think the PreInit hunk should be folded into MousePickProtocol. Created attachment 44192 [details] [review] ver 3 Move PreInit in MousePickProtocol (In reply to comment #5) > Created an attachment (id=44192) [details] > ver 3 > > Move PreInit in MousePickProtocol Looks good to me and works. Tested-by: Matthieu Herrb <matthieu.herrb@laas.fr> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Herrb <matthieu.herrb@laas.fr> Review of attachment 44192 [details] [review]: Can we move this into the switch statement? we already have special casing for PROT_UNKNOWN and PROP_UNSUP, so adding another special case there seems to be the better place. Created attachment 44226 [details] [review] ver 4 Move PreInit into the switch statement. Good idea, thanks. ack by me. Matthieu, can you please re-test the latest version and I'll push it. anything else needed before we release the next version? Alexandr, just noticed this now, can you please attach this as signed-off git-formatted patch. thanks. http://wiki.x.org/wiki/Development/Documentation/SubmittingPatches Created attachment 44276 [details] [review] ver 4 (git-formatted patch) Review of attachment 44276 [details] [review]: Reviewed-by: Matthieu Herrb <matthieu.herrb@laas.fr> (In reply to comment #9) > ack by me. Matthieu, can you please re-test the latest version and I'll push > it. anything else needed before we release the next version? > No problem with version 4. I can't think of anything else blocking a release, although I didn't test any real serial protocol (can't find any old serial mouse around the attic here). > Alexandr, just noticed this now, can you please attach this as signed-off > git-formatted patch. thanks. > http://wiki.x.org/wiki/Development/Documentation/SubmittingPatches commit a22879c6779283684fe4a61543fc95179b4f5d0b Author: Alexandr Shadchin <Alexandr.Shadchin@gmail.com> Date: Wed Mar 9 20:09:59 2011 +0500 Fix BSD issues with new ABI12 init process. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.