Summary: | hw/xfree86/common/{xf86Config.c,xf86Events.c,...}: missing includes | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | xorg | Reporter: | Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes> | ||||
Component: | Server/General | Assignee: | Xorg Project Team <xorg-team> | ||||
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | normal | ||||||
Priority: | high | CC: | dberkholz | ||||
Version: | unspecified | ||||||
Hardware: | Other | ||||||
OS: | FreeBSD | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||||||
Bug Depends on: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 4429 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Diego Elio Pettenò
2005-08-14 08:39:55 UTC
Created attachment 3345 [details] [review] diff-with-cvs-head.patch Created attachment 2909 [details] [review] xorg-server-hw-xfree86-common-includes.patch please explain why gentoo/freebsd needs these, since plain freebsd clearly works already. The LIBC is the same, so if FreeBSD is using patches or there's something in autotools that bypass some of imake tests, Gentoo/FreeBSD hit the problem. They are needed on a FreeBSD that is not using ports, for sure, using current gentoo's ebuilds for autotooled Xorg. i would like to see some indication that these fixes are necessary for stock freebsd systems too. if only portage users need them on freebsd, that would indicate a bug in portage, not in X. This seems tied to bug #4078, have to try with a newer snapshot where that is fixed, and this *should* be fixed, too. [And no, the problem was not portage then] |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.