Summary: | Belarusian Latin-Script Keyboard Layout (by_lat) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | xkeyboard-config | Reporter: | booxter <boox.svaboda2006> |
Component: | General | Assignee: | xkb |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 (IA32) | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Attachments: |
by_lat
New by_lat file |
Description
booxter
2005-09-24 00:45:09 UTC
Created attachment 3391 [details]
by_lat
Place in xkb/symbols/pc. Additional symbols work as
Alt+[wszxcvnlu]
Comment on attachment 3391 [details]
by_lat
Place in xkb/symbols/pc.
Additional symbols are:
Alt+[wszxcvnlu]
why do you need by_lat(nodeadkeys)? It's a Belarusian Latin-Script Keyboard Layout... Why??? 'cause I want to write in latin-script:) > It's a Belarusian Latin-Script Keyboard Layout...
> Why??? 'cause I want to write in latin-script:)
Sorry, you got my question wrong.
1. I understand why you need by_latin. I do not understand why do you need
nodeadkeys variant which is nearly just latin(nodeadkeys) - nothing more.
2. Now, that you mentioned 'I want to write in latin-script' - is it only you
who is using this layout? Is it used only by 2-3 people - or there is some group
of people using it?
1. It's a group. Look at lacinka.com for example. 2. We really don't need nodeadkeys. Here is the new file. Created attachment 3476 [details]
New by_lat file
> 1. It's a group. Look at lacinka.com for example. Ghm, I must be dumb. What should I look for? > 2. We really don't need nodeadkeys. Here is the new file. Good! I will commit it ASAP. Just FYI - since we are using 'layout per country' rule, your layout is going to be by(lat) - in 'Belorussia' layout. committed as by(latin) |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.