| Summary: | move glx related define's from configs/ to src/glx/x11/Makefile | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mesa | Reporter: | George - <fufutos610> |
| Component: | GLX | Assignee: | mesa-dev |
| Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | minor | ||
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | git | ||
| Hardware: | x86 (IA32) | ||
| OS: | Linux (All) | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
| Attachments: | move glx related define's from configs/ to src/glx/x11/Makefile | ||
|
Description
George -
2005-10-08 06:28:21 UTC
Created attachment 3514 [details] [review] move glx related define's from configs/ to src/glx/x11/Makefile How is it more convenient to have to dig for something in some Makefile to change your configuration rather than changing the known configuration location of configs/? (In reply to comment #2) > How is it more convenient to have to dig for something in some Makefile to > change your configuration rather than changing the known configuration location > of configs/? My personal scenario is that I have a main DRI tree configured for my os/arch. If I want to use this tree to compile indirect or xcb, I make clean and make in glx/x11, I need not "reconfigure" my tree. If I want a dedicated tree for indirect or xcb, I need not duplicate the whole tree, I duplicate glx/x11 to glx/xcb and make, no need to change the LD variables to point to new locations also. Anyway ... Of marginal interest. Closing. Mass version move, cvs -> git |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.