Summary: | Recent radeon driver "probed a monitor but no|invalid EDID" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | DRI | Reporter: | Richard Eames <freedesktop> |
Component: | DRM/Radeon | Assignee: | Default DRI bug account <dri-devel> |
Status: | RESOLVED NOTOURBUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | CC: | freedesktop |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86-64 (AMD64) | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: |
Description
Richard Eames
2014-01-07 03:22:45 UTC
Okay, it can't be the xserver-xorg-video-radeon package, since that wasn't upgraded. The packages that were upgraded on the 4th, one of which is causing this: I've removed the kernel and libc upgrade lines since I'm using the mainline build, and since I don't have an intel card, I've removed that line. libgl1-mesa-dev:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), libegl1-mesa:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), libopenvg1-mesa:amd64 (10.1~git1312301930.f425d5~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), libegl1-mesa-drivers:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), libg3dvl-mesa:amd64 (10.1~git1312301930.f425d5~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), libgl1-mesa-dri:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), libglapi-mesa:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), libgles2-mesa:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), libgl1-mesa-glx:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), libxatracker1:amd64 (10.1~git1312301930.f425d5~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), libgbm1:amd64 (10.1~git1312301930.f425d5~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), mesa-common-dev:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), libtxc-dxtn-s2tc0:amd64 (0~git20121227-1, 0~git20131104-1.1~gd~s), libva1:amd64 (1.1.1-3, 1.2.1-2~gd~s), libopus0:amd64 (1.0.1-0ubuntu2, 1.1-0ubuntu1~gd~s), I guess it's probably mesa. I'll compile mesa @ 5a51c1, and see if that fixes things, if so, I'll do I bisect. Looking at the tree, there's only 4 commits in 5a51c1..a61ae2 so maybe not mesa? Mesa has nothing to do with monitor detection. It's probably the kernel. You're right, of course, the mesa update required a newer kernel which may have borked my monitor, or the monitor broke coincidentally, either way, it's the physical monitor that's broken. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.