Bug 73343 - Recent radeon driver "probed a monitor but no|invalid EDID"
Summary: Recent radeon driver "probed a monitor but no|invalid EDID"
Status: RESOLVED NOTOURBUG
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Radeon (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Linux (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Default DRI bug account
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-01-07 03:22 UTC by Richard Eames
Modified: 2014-01-10 03:47 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments

Description Richard Eames 2014-01-07 03:22:45 UTC
I updated my driver yesterday to the latest provided by ppa:oibaf/graphics-drivers, and now I'm having having problems with on of the monitors attached to my (r7 260x) card. 

Snippet from 
[    2.761940] [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid, remainder is 220
[    2.761945] Raw EDID:
[    2.761948]  	00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 1e 6d 3b 58 6a 43 03 00
[    2.761951]  	00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00
[    2.761954]  	0e 50 54 a5 4b 00 71 4f 81 80 81 8f b3 00 01 01
[    2.761956]  	00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00
[    2.761959]  	45 00 dd 0c 11 00 00 1e 00 00 00 fd 00 38 4b 1e
[    2.761962]  	00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00
[    2.761964]  	32 34 31 31 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 ff
[    2.761967]  	00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 00
[    2.790928] [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid, remainder is 220


If you look in the dmesg log, there is also mention of:
  *ERROR* atombios stuck in loop for more than 5secs aborting
My computer did lock up until I installed the latest mainline kernel, but the error still remains. This may be related to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7317



Full Dmesg: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6706927/
Xorg.0.log: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6706938/

Driver
apt-cache policy xserver-xorg-video-radeon
xserver-xorg-video-radeon:
  Installed: 1:7.2.0+git1312250730.04ef03~gd~s
  Candidate: 1:7.2.0+git1312250730.04ef03~gd~s
  Version table:
 *** 1:7.2.0+git1312250730.04ef03~gd~s 0
        500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/oibaf/graphics-drivers/ubuntu/ saucy/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     1:7.2.0-0ubuntu10 0
        500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ saucy/main amd64 Packages

Kernel:
linux-image-3.13.0-999-generic_3.13.0-999.201401060405_amd64
Comment 1 Richard Eames 2014-01-07 05:27:42 UTC
Okay, it can't be the xserver-xorg-video-radeon package, since that wasn't upgraded. The packages that were upgraded on the 4th, one of which is causing this:

I've removed the kernel and libc upgrade lines since I'm using the mainline build, and since I don't have an intel card, I've removed that line.
libgl1-mesa-dev:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s),
libegl1-mesa:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), 
libopenvg1-mesa:amd64 (10.1~git1312301930.f425d5~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), 
libegl1-mesa-drivers:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), 
libg3dvl-mesa:amd64 (10.1~git1312301930.f425d5~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), 
libgl1-mesa-dri:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), 
libglapi-mesa:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s),
libgles2-mesa:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s),
libgl1-mesa-glx:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), 
libxatracker1:amd64 (10.1~git1312301930.f425d5~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), 
libgbm1:amd64 (10.1~git1312301930.f425d5~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s), 
mesa-common-dev:amd64 (10.1~git1312310730.5a51c1~gd~s, 10.1~git1401041930.a61ae2~gd~s),
libtxc-dxtn-s2tc0:amd64 (0~git20121227-1, 0~git20131104-1.1~gd~s),
libva1:amd64 (1.1.1-3, 1.2.1-2~gd~s), 

libopus0:amd64 (1.0.1-0ubuntu2, 1.1-0ubuntu1~gd~s), 

I guess it's probably mesa. I'll compile mesa @ 5a51c1, and see if that fixes things, if so, I'll do I bisect. Looking at the tree, there's only 4 commits in 5a51c1..a61ae2 so maybe not mesa?
Comment 2 Michel Dänzer 2014-01-07 06:02:38 UTC
Mesa has nothing to do with monitor detection. It's probably the kernel.
Comment 3 Richard Eames 2014-01-10 03:47:00 UTC
You're right, of course, the mesa update required a newer kernel which may have borked my monitor, or the monitor broke coincidentally, either way, it's the physical monitor that's broken.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.