Summary: | xdg-desktop-menu --vendor needs work | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portland | Reporter: | Tom Whipple <bug> |
Component: | xdg-utils | Assignee: | Portland Integration Project <portland> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 (IA32) | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 7011 |
Description
Tom Whipple
2006-07-13 13:14:14 UTC
Proposed solution: Verify that desktop references in .menu file have a proper vendor prefix. Should the --vendor argument be mandatory? (In reply to comment #1) Requiring a file to be refered to as 'vendorid-filename.desktop' in the .menu file but requiring it to be installed via 'install --vendor vendorid filename.desktop' seems conter-intuitive. It seems to me the --vendor tag sould be able to edit the menu file or be removed entirely. Furthermore, --vendor should only be mandated if it is present and mandated for all install time utilities to preserve a consistent interface. Fixed for beta 2. Removed --vendor, check for vendor prefix on input files instead. Added --novendor to override check. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.