Summary: | [g33] regression: piglit.spec.!opengl 1_0.gl-1_0-beginend-coverage | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Mesa | Reporter: | Mark Janes <mark.a.janes> |
Component: | Drivers/DRI/i915 | Assignee: | Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Default DRI bug account <dri-devel> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | git | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Attachments: |
test output
possible fix |
Description
Mark Janes
2017-01-13 20:02:00 UTC
FYI, G33 uses i915_dri.so, not i965_dri.so. Pretty much any hardware which uses that older driver would probably reproduce this. My bisection was incorrect. The tests regressed at the previous commit: 963311b71fd9900351a4a9dd1cd5f5db391f7e1b Author: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com> mesa/main: fix version/extension checks in _mesa_ClampColor That test doesn't call glClampColor (and if it did, that would be incorrect). So that's odd. Does i915 use some of the meta code? That might be calling _mesa_ClampColor without proper checking. Created attachment 128979 [details] [review] possible fix Of all the internal callers of _mesa_ClampColor, there's one that isn't properly guarded, and that piglit test should hit it -- so the attached patch should fix this, but please test and confirm on i915. Thanks! Nicolai's patch fixes the test for me. fixed by a7c635ec6589f600f0d52d0097774ea0b938de9f |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.