Bug 101369 - [HSW] GPU Hang With Wine Supreme Commander 2 ecode 7:0:0x87df7c12
Summary: [HSW] GPU Hang With Wine Supreme Commander 2 ecode 7:0:0x87df7c12
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Intel (show other bugs)
Version: XOrg git
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Linux (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-06-10 10:11 UTC by coolo1mc
Modified: 2017-06-21 15:14 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform: HSW
i915 features:


Attachments
error log (37.38 KB, text/plain)
2017-06-10 10:11 UTC, coolo1mc
no flags Details
limit all state (2.33 KB, patch)
2017-06-10 12:25 UTC, Chris Wilson
no flags Details | Splinter Review

Description coolo1mc 2017-06-10 10:11:15 UTC
Created attachment 131839 [details]
error log
Comment 1 Chris Wilson 2017-06-10 12:25:50 UTC
Created attachment 131840 [details] [review]
limit all state

More errors with invalid access to 0. Looks like residual state from the earlier context. What happens if you apply the attached to xf86-video-intel?
Comment 2 coolo1mc 2017-06-11 14:13:44 UTC
Wasnt entirely sure what I was meant to do (havent strayed away from provided binaries so far)
I cloned the xf86-video-intel git repo, applied the diff you sent, ran an autogen, make and sudo make install, then restarted X, is that correct?
Comment 3 Elizabeth 2017-06-15 16:37:44 UTC
Could you please add more information about this bug, platform, feature, HW and SW information?
Comment 4 Chris Wilson 2017-06-15 16:48:06 UTC
(In reply to coolo1mc from comment #2)
> Wasnt entirely sure what I was meant to do (havent strayed away from
> provided binaries so far)
> I cloned the xf86-video-intel git repo, applied the diff you sent, ran an
> autogen, make and sudo make install, then restarted X, is that correct?

Hmm, if you were not careful that installed into /usr/local/lib/xorg which may not be picked up. If you check Xorg.0.log, it should contain a statement along the lines of "SNA compiled from git-..." that will match git describe. If not, try again with ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr.
Comment 5 coolo1mc 2017-06-15 22:42:05 UTC
(In reply to elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena from comment #3)
> Could you please add more information about this bug, platform, feature, HW
> and SW information?

Void linux, xf86-video-intel-2.99.917.56, mesa-intel-dri-17.1.2, 64bit, intel i7 4770k, linux4.11-4.11.5
Comment 6 coolo1mc 2017-06-16 02:26:00 UTC
(In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #4)
> (In reply to coolo1mc from comment #2)
> > Wasnt entirely sure what I was meant to do (havent strayed away from
> > provided binaries so far)
> > I cloned the xf86-video-intel git repo, applied the diff you sent, ran an
> > autogen, make and sudo make install, then restarted X, is that correct?
> 
> Hmm, if you were not careful that installed into /usr/local/lib/xorg which
> may not be picked up. If you check Xorg.0.log, it should contain a statement
> along the lines of "SNA compiled from git-..." that will match git describe.
> If not, try again with ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr.

$ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep SNA
[ 60005.615] (II) intel(0): SNA compiled from 2.99.917-777-g6babcf15
[ 60005.617] (II) intel(0): SNA initialized with Haswell (gen7.5, gt2) backend

 12:25:09  conor@decimator  ~ 
$ cd xf86-video-intel

 12:25:16  conor@decimator  ~/xf86-video-intel   master ✘ ✹ ✭ 
$ git describe
2.99.917-777-g6babcf15          
this looks all good then :P
Comment 7 Elizabeth 2017-06-16 22:22:38 UTC
(In reply to coolo1mc from comment #6)
> (In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #4)
> > (In reply to coolo1mc from comment #2)
> > > Wasnt entirely sure what I was meant to do (havent strayed away from
> > > provided binaries so far)
> > > I cloned the xf86-video-intel git repo, applied the diff you sent, ran an
> > > autogen, make and sudo make install, then restarted X, is that correct?
> > 
> > Hmm, if you were not careful that installed into /usr/local/lib/xorg which
> > may not be picked up. If you check Xorg.0.log, it should contain a statement
> > along the lines of "SNA compiled from git-..." that will match git describe.
> > If not, try again with ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr.
> 
> $ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep SNA
> [ 60005.615] (II) intel(0): SNA compiled from 2.99.917-777-g6babcf15
> [ 60005.617] (II) intel(0): SNA initialized with Haswell (gen7.5, gt2)
> backend
> 
>  12:25:09  conor@decimator  ~ 
> $ cd xf86-video-intel
> 
>  12:25:16  conor@decimator  ~/xf86-video-intel   master ✘ ✹ ✭ 
> $ git describe
> 2.99.917-777-g6babcf15          
> this looks all good then :P

Could you please share the status on this bug? Do the problem has been fixed? Thank you.
Comment 8 coolo1mc 2017-06-18 07:06:19 UTC
(In reply to elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena from comment #7)
> (In reply to coolo1mc from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to coolo1mc from comment #2)
> > > > Wasnt entirely sure what I was meant to do (havent strayed away from
> > > > provided binaries so far)
> > > > I cloned the xf86-video-intel git repo, applied the diff you sent, ran an
> > > > autogen, make and sudo make install, then restarted X, is that correct?
> > > 
> > > Hmm, if you were not careful that installed into /usr/local/lib/xorg which
> > > may not be picked up. If you check Xorg.0.log, it should contain a statement
> > > along the lines of "SNA compiled from git-..." that will match git describe.
> > > If not, try again with ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr.
> > 
> > $ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep SNA
> > [ 60005.615] (II) intel(0): SNA compiled from 2.99.917-777-g6babcf15
> > [ 60005.617] (II) intel(0): SNA initialized with Haswell (gen7.5, gt2)
> > backend
> > 
> >  12:25:09  conor@decimator  ~ 
> > $ cd xf86-video-intel
> > 
> >  12:25:16  conor@decimator  ~/xf86-video-intel   master ✘ ✹ ✭ 
> > $ git describe
> > 2.99.917-777-g6babcf15          
> > this looks all good then :P
> 
> Could you please share the status on this bug? Do the problem has been
> fixed? Thank you.

Have not run into the problem since applying the patch, so I think it may have fixed it.
Comment 9 Elizabeth 2017-06-21 15:14:25 UTC
(In reply to coolo1mc from comment #8)
> Have not run into the problem since applying the patch, so I think it may
> have fixed it.

Thank you for the answer, I'm closing the bug now. If the problem appear again, please share the information and change the status to REOPEN.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.