Baytrail "Toshiba Chromebook 2" "Swanky" Samsung U28E590D UHD 4K HDMI connection (HDMI 2 on screen) Wayland Fedora devel xrandr --verbose xrandr --verbose Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1920 x 2160, maximum 8192 x 8192 XWAYLAND0 connected 1920x1080+0+0 (0x24) normal (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 610mm x 350mm Identifier: 0x21 Timestamp: 44556 Subpixel: unknown Gamma: 1.0:1.0:1.0 Brightness: 0.0 Clones: CRTC: 0 CRTCs: 0 Transform: 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 filter: 1920x1080 (0x24) 173.000MHz -HSync +VSync *current +preferred h: width 1920 start 2048 end 2248 total 2576 skew 0 clock 67.16KHz v: height 1080 start 1083 end 1088 total 1120 clock 59.96Hz XWAYLAND1 connected 1920x1080+0+1080 (0x24) normal (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 290mm x 170mm Identifier: 0x23 Timestamp: 44556 Subpixel: unknown Gamma: 1.0:1.0:1.0 Brightness: 0.0 Clones: CRTC: 1 CRTCs: 1 Transform: 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 filter: 1920x1080 (0x24) 173.000MHz -HSync +VSync *current +preferred h: width 1920 start 2048 end 2248 total 2576 skew 0 clock 67.16KHz v: height 1080 start 1083 end 1088 total 1120 clock 59.96Hz
Created attachment 134256 [details] lspci
Created attachment 134257 [details] Boot log
Created attachment 134258 [details] dmesg
Baytrail doesn't support 4k HDMI. The maximum pixel clock you can push through the HDMI port is 225MHz, which limits you to ~2400x1300 max resolution (assuming 16:9 aspect ratio). 4k would be possible over DP.
Well 2400x1300 would still be better than 1920x1080 I suppose an hdmi do display port converter won't allow going further, the limit is in the chipset hdmi support ?
(In reply to Nicolas Mailhot from comment #6) > Well 2400x1300 would still be better than 1920x1080 Between 3840x2160 and 1920x1080 your display only supports 2560x1440 which also requires a pixel clock too high for your Baytrail. > I suppose an hdmi do display port converter won't allow going further, the > limit is in the chipset hdmi support ? Correct. You might get it to work using a DP to HDMI active protocol converter, but truthfully there have been issues with them too. It's still NOTABUG.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.