Bug 103444 - [CI] igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-[render|bsd] - fail - Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0
Summary: [CI] igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-[render|bsd] - fail - Failed assertion: __vge...
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Intel (show other bugs)
Version: DRI git
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
URL:
Whiteboard: ReadyForDev
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-10-25 08:14 UTC by Marta Löfstedt
Modified: 2018-01-11 07:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform: BXT, GLK, KBL
i915 features: GEM/Other


Attachments

Description Marta Löfstedt 2017-10-25 08:14:43 UTC
Ci_DRM_3278 APL- and GLK-shards, igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-render

(gem_exec_schedule:3475) igt-vgem-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function vgem_fence_signal, file igt_vgem.c:193:
(gem_exec_schedule:3475) igt-vgem-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0
(gem_exec_schedule:3475) igt-vgem-CRITICAL: error: -110 != 0
Subtest wide-render failed.

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3278/shard-apl3/igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-render.html
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3278/shard-glkb2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-render.html
Comment 1 Chris Wilson 2017-10-25 09:57:05 UTC
All 3 machines show a dramatic slow down for that single test run, unrelated to the kernel changes. That's highly suspicious that something in the build/run environment was changed.

kbl:
IGT-Version: 1.20-ge5f7fac9 (x86_64) (Linux: 4.14.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_3277+ x86_64)
Using Execlists submission
Has kernel scheduler
 - With priority sorting
 - With preemption enabled
Submitted 9 requests over 4096 contexts in 5698.4ms
->
IGT-Version: 1.20-g3a52d8c2 (x86_64) (Linux: 4.14.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_3278+ x86_64)
Using Execlists submission
Has kernel scheduler
 - With priority sorting
 - With preemption enabled
Submitted 1 requests over 4096 contexts in 11570.8ms
(Run after: Submitted 9 requests over 4096 contexts in 5675.9ms)

bxt:
IGT-Version: 1.20-ge5f7fac9 (x86_64) (Linux: 4.14.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_3277+ x86_64)
Using Execlists submission
Has kernel scheduler
 - With priority sorting
 - With preemption enabled
Submitted 2 requests over 4096 contexts in 7771.1ms
->
IGT-Version: 1.20-g3a52d8c2 (x86_64) (Linux: 4.14.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_3278+ x86_64)
Using Execlists submission
Has kernel scheduler
 - With priority sorting
 - With preemption enabled
Submitted 1 requests over 4096 contexts in 11570.8ms
(Run after: Submitted 2 requests over 4096 contexts in 7760.5m)

glk:
IGT-Version: 1.20-ge5f7fac9 (x86_64) (Linux: 4.14.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_3277+ x86_64)
Using Execlists submission
Has kernel scheduler
 - With priority sorting
 - With preemption enabled
Submitted 4 requests over 4096 contexts in 6377.1ms
->
IGT-Version: 1.20-g3a52d8c2 (x86_64) (Linux: 4.14.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_3278+ x86_64)
Using Execlists submission
Has kernel scheduler
 - With priority sorting
 - With preemption enabled
Submitted 1 requests over 4096 contexts in 13258.6ms
(Run after: Submitted 4 requests over 4096 contexts in 6381.2ms)
Comment 2 Marta Löfstedt 2017-11-03 11:47:47 UTC
New sub-test:
CI_DRM_3311 shard-glkb1 igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-bsd

(gem_exec_schedule:9837) igt-vgem-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function vgem_fence_signal, file igt_vgem.c:193:
(gem_exec_schedule:9837) igt-vgem-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0
(gem_exec_schedule:9837) igt-vgem-CRITICAL: error: -110 != 0
Subtest wide-bsd failed.

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3311/shard-glkb1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-bsd.html
Comment 3 Marta Löfstedt 2017-11-07 13:42:42 UTC
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3318/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@reorder-wide-bsd1.html

(gem_exec_schedule:2037) igt-vgem-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function vgem_fence_signal, file igt_vgem.c:193:
(gem_exec_schedule:2037) igt-vgem-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __vgem_fence_signal(fd, fence) == 0
(gem_exec_schedule:2037) igt-vgem-CRITICAL: error: -110 != 0
Subtest reorder-wide-bsd1 failed.
Comment 4 Marta Löfstedt 2018-01-11 07:58:13 UTC
This issue is no longer reproducible, I will close and archive


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.