Bug 103813 - Synaptics Touchpad is not precise. Very hard to hit small buttons. Instead of moving fluently it seems to skip a few pixels.
Summary: Synaptics Touchpad is not precise. Very hard to hit small buttons. Instead of...
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Wayland
Classification: Unclassified
Component: libinput (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Linux (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Wayland bug list
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-11-19 10:14 UTC by vince.alternate
Modified: 2018-04-17 01:57 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments
evemu recording (57.37 KB, text/plain)
2017-11-19 10:14 UTC, vince.alternate
Details
screen recording of the pointer moving (796.40 KB, video/webm)
2017-11-19 10:15 UTC, vince.alternate
Details
screen recording of the issue (38.93 KB, video/webm)
2018-01-14 07:59 UTC, Jo Gro
Details

Description vince.alternate 2017-11-19 10:14:41 UTC
Created attachment 135583 [details]
evemu recording

Ubuntu 17.10 wayland
Acer Aspire v5 573g

Synaptics Touchpad worked perfectly under Windows. 
Now it feels like as if the "resolution" of the touchpad is really low. Or that the driver only reads every 50 touchpad units. So if I try to move the pointer really slowly to a small close button the pointer may not move at all until it suddenly jumps a few pixels. When moving diagonally the pointer follows a stair like pattern (like you see in videogames wihtout antialiasing).

This makes hitting small buttons or selecting text very hard.
Comment 1 vince.alternate 2017-11-19 10:15:28 UTC
Created attachment 135584 [details]
screen recording of the pointer moving
Comment 2 Peter Hutterer 2017-11-20 03:44:54 UTC
try git master, it removed the hysteresis which should make small movements more reliable
Comment 3 vince.alternate 2017-11-20 07:29:44 UTC
I'm using libinput 1.9.1 now.  It has improved a bit which I could confirm using libinput-debug-events.

 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +95.31s	  0.13/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +95.96s	  0.12/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +96.39s	  0.11/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +96.52s	  0.11/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +96.80s	  0.11/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +96.97s	  0.11/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +96.98s	  0.11/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +97.51s	  0.11/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +97.89s	  0.11/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +97.90s	  0.11/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +97.97s	  1.94/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +98.13s	  0.00/  0.10
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +98.27s	  0.00/  0.10
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +98.69s	 -1.96/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +98.71s	  6.24/  5.69

this is how it looks now when doing very precise movements. Beforehand the 0.11 would be 0.00 meaning the pointer wouldn't move at all until 6.24 / 5.69.
So the small movements by 0.11 is a big improvement already.

Sadly every 20 events or so a big jump like 6.24 / 5.69 still occurs. Which is still kind of annoying to deal with. 

Maybe this has something to do with mouse acceleration?
Comment 4 Peter Hutterer 2017-11-20 08:31:12 UTC
1.9.1 still has the hysteresis enabled, you'll need to try git master for that bit.
Comment 5 vince.alternate 2017-11-20 08:48:37 UTC
I git cloned https://github.com/wayland-project/libinput cded into libinput (powerline showed me that i'm in master branch) and used meson and ninja to build and updated.

libinput --version still says 1.9.1 though so I'm not sure if I'm doing this correctly.
Comment 6 Peter Hutterer 2017-11-22 04:17:37 UTC
good point, I forgot to bump the version on the master branch. Fixed now with  6a8d5a6e0, thanks.
Comment 7 vince.alternate 2017-11-22 06:39:08 UTC
Okay I'm using 1.9.900 now

Touchpad still behaving erratic

 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +30.11s	  0.13/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +30.12s	  0.12/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +30.22s	  0.12/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +30.23s	  0.12/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +30.24s	  0.12/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +30.25s	  0.13/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +30.26s	  0.13/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +30.27s	  0.13/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +30.40s	  2.82/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +30.41s	 -5.07/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +30.42s	  5.55/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +30.50s	 -5.35/  0.00
 event5   POINTER_MOTION   +30.54s	  1.73/  0.00

I moved the pointer very slowly from left to right. It works normally for a few pixels then suddenly jumps forward / backward.

I found someone with a similar problem using a thinkpad x220 if that helps.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264453
Comment 8 Peter Hutterer 2017-11-22 23:28:14 UTC
the stair pattern should be gone with the hysteresis gone?

If one prints the per-slot deltas the problem is visible:

 0.148118:              |  *********** | 
 0.176980:              |  *********** | 
 0.207288:              |  *********** | 
 0.226218:              |  *********** | 
 0.236147:              |  *********** | 
 0.246356: ↑↗   31/ -43 |  *********** | 
 0.314911: →↘   31/   7 |  *********** | 
 0.325129: →↘   31/   4 |  *********** | 
 0.335191: →↘   31/   1 |  *********** | 
 0.364298: →↗   31/  -6 |  *********** | 
 0.374541: →↘   31/   4 |  *********** | 
 0.383795: →↘   31/   1 |  *********** | 
 0.393685: →↘    7/   1 |  *********** | 
 0.403613: →↘    5/   1 |  *********** | 
 0.413709: →↘    1/   1 |  *********** | 
 0.423796: ↓↘    1/   4 |  *********** | 
 0.432893: →↘    1/   1 |  *********** | 
 0.443063: →↘    1/   1 |  *********** | 

so no movement, then several movemnts with 31 units (42 units == 1mm), then smaller movements. This repeats often:

 2.167606: →↘    1/   1 |  *********** | 
 2.177573: →↘    1/   1 |  *********** | 
 2.187647: →↘    4/   1 |  *********** | 
 2.196651: ↓↘    1/  18 |  *********** | 
 2.206751: →↘   20/  18 |  *********** | 
 2.226926: ↓↘    1/  18 |  *********** | 
 2.236070: ↓↘    1/  18 |  *********** | 
 2.246686: ↓↘    1/  18 |  *********** | 
 2.255925: ↓↘    1/  18 |  *********** | 
 2.265937: ↓↘    1/  18 |  *********** | 
 2.275980: ↓↘    1/  18 |  *********** | 
 2.285035: ↑↗    1/  -7 |  *********** | 


That 20 in there would give you a jump. In other words, the data coming out of the device is bad and we need some code to detect and paper over these jumps. Not sure how to do this yet, suggestions appreciated

Tool used: https://github.com/whot/input-data-analysis/tree/master/per-slot-deltas
Comment 9 Jo Gro 2018-01-14 07:28:33 UTC
i have the same problem with ELAN touchpad, feels like it skips after every "n" movements and then jumps to catch-up to finger. The faster you move the finger, the more often it jumps

have it on both libinput 1.9.3 and 1.9.900

per-slot-delta output:

11.804130: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
11.816446: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.034435: →↗   13/  -1 |  *********** |
12.060522: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.085206: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.111328: →↗    2/  -1 |  *********** |
12.124130: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.151906: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.182069: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.214404: →↗    2/  -1 |  *********** |
12.242133: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.253445: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.264750: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.277063: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.316001: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.329307: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.342120: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.354944: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.366272: →↗    2/  -1 |  *********** |
12.392937: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.405262: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.431897: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.444723: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.456041: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.482623: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.508823: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.521657: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.545798: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.559627:              |  *********** |
12.584754: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.598580: →↗    2/  -1 |  *********** |
12.624224: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.635513: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.649337: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.674440: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.688258: ↑↗    1/  -1 |  *********** |
12.854909:              |  *********** |
12.905671:              |  *********** |
12.918479: →↗   13/  -2 |  *********** |
12.931288: ↑↗    1/  -2 |  *********** |
12.944892: ↑↗    1/  -2 |  *********** |
Comment 10 Jo Gro 2018-01-14 07:59:45 UTC
Created attachment 136714 [details]
screen recording of the issue

fedora 27, no difference between wayland and xorg sessions

attaching a video of the issue ( libinput 1.9.900 )
Comment 11 Peter Hutterer 2018-01-16 06:52:57 UTC
judging by comment 9, the two 13/y would give a cursor jump. As with the other device, I don't know how to fix this. *maybe* some averaging but that would introduce delay into the finger movement - not ideal given how many people already complain about that.
Comment 12 Jo Gro 2018-01-16 10:59:53 UTC
it just feels almost like there are tiny "deadzones" spread out equally across the touchpad. Could it be some problem with resolution calculation?
Comment 13 Peter Hutterer 2018-02-21 00:03:10 UTC
fwiw, at least on the T450 generation laptops that's exactly what happens: https://who-t.blogspot.com.au/2016/09/libinput-and-lenovo-t450-and-t460.html
Comment 14 Peter Hutterer 2018-03-01 07:29:02 UTC
I'm wondering if bug 105303 has something to do with that, although that wouldn't trigger a delta of 13. Still, might be worth trying this script:

#!/bin/bash
  
fuzz=0
device=/dev/input/event4
sudo libevdev-tweak-device --abs ABS_X --fuzz $fuzz $device
sudo libevdev-tweak-device --abs ABS_Y --fuzz $fuzz $device
sudo libevdev-tweak-device --abs ABS_MT_POSITION_X --fuzz $fuzz $device
sudo libevdev-tweak-device --abs ABS_MT_POSITION_Y --fuzz $fuzz $device


Run that against the touchpad device (i.e. replace the device node accordingly) and restart X. This may cause some pointer wobble, the question is whether it reduces the jumps.
Comment 15 Peter Hutterer 2018-04-17 01:57:00 UTC
Needinfo for too long, closing


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.