Bug 104160 - [CI] igt@perf_pmu@most-busy-check-all-rcs0 - fail - Failed assertion: (double)(val[i]) <= (1.0 + (tolerance)) * (double)(batch_duration_ns) && (double)(val[i]) >= (1.0 - (tolerance)) * (double)(batch_duration_ns) (perf_pmu:1963) CRITICAL: 'val[i]' != 'bat
Summary: [CI] igt@perf_pmu@most-busy-check-all-rcs0 - fail - Failed assertion: (double...
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Intel (show other bugs)
Version: DRI git
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
URL:
Whiteboard: ReadyForDev
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-12-07 09:16 UTC by Marta Löfstedt
Modified: 2018-01-02 08:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform: GLK
i915 features: Perf/OA


Attachments

Description Marta Löfstedt 2017-12-07 09:16:21 UTC
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4040/shard-glkb6/igt@perf_pmu@most-busy-check-all-rcs0.html

(perf_pmu:1963) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function most_busy_check_all, file perf_pmu.c:278:
(perf_pmu:1963) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: (double)(val[i]) <= (1.0 + (tolerance)) * (double)(batch_duration_ns) && (double)(val[i]) >= (1.0 - (tolerance)) * (double)(batch_duration_ns)
(perf_pmu:1963) CRITICAL: 'val[i]' != 'batch_duration_ns' (528670614.000000 not within 5.000000% tolerance of 500000000.000000)
Subtest most-busy-check-all-rcs0 failed.
Comment 1 Chris Wilson 2017-12-22 20:55:13 UTC
commit d161bbbc8f17bd81ad75f0e7f9f77d2af9dcbf28
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Fri Dec 15 15:07:33 2017 +0000

    igt/perf_pmu: Tighten measurements for most-busy
    
    Create all the spinners before starting the sampler and then measure how
    long we sleep.
    
    Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104160
    Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
    Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
    Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.