https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4192/shard-apl5/igt@perf_pmu@frequency.html (perf_pmu:2942) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function test_frequency, file perf_pmu.c:1112: (perf_pmu:2942) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: (double)(min[0]) <= (1.0 + (tolerance)) * (double)(min_freq) && (double)(min[0]) >= (1.0 - (tolerance)) * (double)(min_freq) (perf_pmu:2942) CRITICAL: Last errno: 9, Bad file descriptor (perf_pmu:2942) CRITICAL: 'min[0]' != 'min_freq' (91.985455 not within 5.000000% tolerance of 100.000000) Subtest frequency failed.
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3688/shard-glkb2/igt@perf_pmu@frequency.html (perf_pmu:2998) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function test_frequency, file perf_pmu.c:1112: (perf_pmu:2998) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: (double)(min[0]) <= (1.0 + (tolerance)) * (double)(min_freq) && (double)(min[0]) >= (1.0 - (tolerance)) * (double)(min_freq) (perf_pmu:2998) CRITICAL: Last errno: 9, Bad file descriptor (perf_pmu:2998) CRITICAL: 'min[0]' != 'min_freq' (93.985883 not within 5.000000% tolerance of 100.000000) Subtest frequency failed.
these are on 2 platforms same run. However green after so I file on this bug https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3712/shard-apl1/igt@perf_pmu@semaphore-wait-vecs0.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3712/shard-glkb3/igt@perf_pmu@semaphore-wait-vecs0.html
Same run 2 machines: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3729/shard-glkb2/igt@perf_pmu@frequency.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3729/shard-apl8/igt@perf_pmu@frequency.html
(In reply to Marta Löfstedt from comment #2) > these are on 2 platforms same run. However green after so I file on this bug > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3712/shard-apl1/ > igt@perf_pmu@semaphore-wait-vecs0.html > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3712/shard-glkb3/ > igt@perf_pmu@semaphore-wait-vecs0.html These will be moved to bug 105011
Last seen: CI_DRM_3731: 2018-02-07 / 260 runs ago
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.