Bug 104966 - [CI] igt@perf_pmu@* - fail - Failed assertion: fd >= 0
Summary: [CI] igt@perf_pmu@* - fail - Failed assertion: fd >= 0
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Intel (show other bugs)
Version: DRI git
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Marta Löfstedt
QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
URL:
Whiteboard: ReadyForDev
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2018-02-06 07:20 UTC by Marta Löfstedt
Modified: 2018-02-07 06:49 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform: BXT
i915 features: Perf/OA


Attachments

Description Marta Löfstedt 2018-02-06 07:20:45 UTC
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3724/shard-apl6/igt@perf_pmu@other-init-3.html
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3724/shard-apl6/igt@perf_pmu@init-wait-vcs1.html
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3724/shard-apl6/igt@perf_pmu@busy-no-semaphores-vcs0.html

(perf_pmu:1797) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function open_group, file perf_pmu.c:67:
(perf_pmu:1797) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: fd >= 0
(perf_pmu:1797) CRITICAL: Last errno: 22, Invalid argument
Subtest busy-no-semaphores-vcs0 failed.
Comment 1 Tvrtko Ursulin 2018-02-06 09:24:34 UTC
This run seems to be before the latest IGT fixes so I'd be tempted to close it. Although I cannot at the moment explain a short build window in which these tests failed so maybe it deserves a more detailed look time permitting.
Comment 2 Marta Löfstedt 2018-02-06 10:05:57 UTC
(In reply to Tvrtko Ursulin from comment #1)
> This run seems to be before the latest IGT fixes so I'd be tempted to close
> it. Although I cannot at the moment explain a short build window in which
> these tests failed so maybe it deserves a more detailed look time permitting.

I assign it to me and monitor and close when if we will have positive results


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.