Note, we are now pulling in data from full CI runs from CNL and CFL BAT machines. Also this is not the same result as bug 103345 https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3903/fi-cfl-u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-rgb101010-draw-mmap-gtt.html (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:1778) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function do_status_assertions, file kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c:1861: (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:1778) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !psr_is_enabled() (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:1778) CRITICAL: PSR still enabled Subtest psr-rgb101010-draw-mmap-gtt failed.
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3903/fi-cfl-u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-farfromfence.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3903/fi-cfl-u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt.htmlhttps://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3903/fi-cfl-u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3903/fi-cfl-u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3903/fi-cfl-u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-rgb565-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3903/fi-cfl-u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-farfromfence.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3903/fi-cfl-u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3903/fi-cfl-u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3903/fi-cfl-u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3903/fi-cfl-u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3903/fi-cfl-u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-indfb-fliptrack.html
Expected failure, as we don't modify the debugfs active flag on frontbuffer flush. Let's lower the priority on this as I am already working on a fix and PSR is not enabled by default.
(In reply to Dhinakaran Pandiyan from comment #2) > Expected failure, as we don't modify the debugfs active flag on frontbuffer > flush. Let's lower the priority on this as I am already working on a fix and > PSR is not enabled by default. Since this is on CFL-u my guess is that priority will soon be higher...
This tests has a failed on CNL QA Tests List: igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-indfb-fliptrack igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-scndscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-farfromfence igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-rgb565-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-farfromfence igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-rgb101010-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-rgb565-draw-mmap-gtt software: IGT-Version: 1.22-gc30e331 (x86_64) (Linux: 4.16.0-rc6-drm-intel-qa-ww12-commit-dff9ece+ x86_64) Output sample: (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:891) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function do_status_assertions, file kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c:1764: (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:891) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !psr_is_enabled() (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:891) CRITICAL: PSR still enabled (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:891) igt-core-INFO: Stack trace: (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:891) igt-core-INFO: #0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x101] (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:891) igt-core-INFO: #1 [__do_assertions+0x606] (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:891) igt-core-INFO: #2 [draw_subtest+0x12d] (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:891) igt-core-INFO: #3 [main+0x1442] (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:891) igt-core-INFO: #4 [__libc_start_main+0xf1] (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:891) igt-core-INFO: #5 [_start+0x29] (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:891) igt-core-INFO: #6 [<unknown>+0x29]
A couple of new examples from drmtip_7 https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_7/fi-glk-1/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-rgb565-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_7/fi-kbl-r/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-rgb565-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_7/fi-glk-1/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-rgb101010-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_7/fi-kbl-r/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-rgb101010-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_7/fi-cnl-y3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-scndscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_7/fi-skl-6700hq/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_7/fi-skl-6600u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_7/fi-kbl-r/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_7/fi-glk-1/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_7/fi-cnl-y3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html
This tests was failing on CNL QA Test list: igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-scndscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt output sample: . . . (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:1585) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function do_status_assertions, file kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c:1756: (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:1585) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !psr_is_enabled() (kms_frontbuffer_tracking:1585) CRITICAL: PSR still enabled Subtest fbcpsr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt failed. . . . software: IGT-Version: 1.22-g2ef96ec (x86_64) (Linux: 4.16.0-rc7-drm-tip-ww15-commit-d123888+ x86_64)
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_24/fi-kbl-7560u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_24/fi-kbl-7560u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html
Martin - it looks like this is also an "idle run" bug for PSR? How often does it reproduce? (Also, is there an easy way for me to determine that myself? :) )
Fix submitted to mailing list https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/238482/ tests/frontbuffer_tracking: Use the library functions to test PSR. kms_frontbuffer_tracking should test PSR the same way that kms_psr does. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
*** Bug 104466 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
(In reply to Dhinakaran Pandiyan from comment #9) > Fix submitted to mailing list > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/238482/ > > tests/frontbuffer_tracking: Use the library functions to test PSR. > > kms_frontbuffer_tracking should test PSR the same way that kms_psr does. > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> The patch does the fix this bug, verified adding the relevant test cases to ff list. https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_1590/all.html
Issue last visible in CI more than 2 weeks ago. Closing this bug.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.