Bug 105804 - Custom resolutions for Wayland
Summary: Custom resolutions for Wayland
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Wayland
Classification: Unclassified
Component: wayland (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Wayland bug list
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2018-03-29 09:16 UTC by kkllusq
Modified: 2018-03-29 09:56 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments

Description kkllusq 2018-03-29 09:16:23 UTC
Hello
I've been using Wayland for quite a long time already. Since one of my displays provides invalid EDID data, I'm unable to set the resolution properly, because the OS think that the device supports only 4 resolutions: 640x480, 848x480, 800x600 and 1024x768.
Until lately, I used a hacky solution – forcing the kernel to load a specific EDID for specific output on boot. That way, I was able to use only resolution specified in that EDID.
But lately, that solution stopped working on my machine, and, since Wayland does not support adding custom resolution, I was forced back to X, because thanks to xrandr I'm capable of doing so.
I think that Wayland should have an option to replicate that feature.
Comment 1 Pekka Paalanen 2018-03-29 09:56:40 UTC
Hi,

adding custom video modes is a feature of your particular Wayland display server.

All configuration is up to each Wayland display server individually. They could agree on a mutual configuration standard, but that would be out of scope for Wayland as understood by the bugzilla product/component in this bug.

Loading an EDID file through the kernel seems like a good solution to me, so it might be worth figuring out why it stopped working.

If you want to make a configuration with your display server, please consult your specific display server documentation.

FWIW, for years people have come up once in a while suggesting that Wayland should replicate X11 RandR, but it has never gained enough traction with the major desktop projects to become a serious proposal. Sorry.

I think two major counter-arguments are: a) access control, we do not want arbitrary applications changing video modes at will, and b) once the Wayland display server accepts connections so that an app could program a video mode, the server has already initialized the display hardware so it's too late and will lead to glitchy user experience. Drafting such an interface would also be a considerable amount of work for a feature that most big desktop environments already implement by some other means.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.