bug 102614 

[  249.764040] [drm:drm_crtc_add_crc_entry] *ERROR* Overflow of CRC buffer, userspace reads too slow. 

maybe a hint for GLK and SKL.

Moving to high priority since there is an owner following this

(In reply to Marta Löfstedt from comment #1)
> bug 102614 
> 
> [  249.764040] [drm:drm_crtc_add_crc_entry] *ERROR* Overflow of CRC buffer,
> userspace reads too slow. 
> 
> maybe a hint for GLK and SKL.

I have noticed the above overflow error message even on BYT. I think this is the reason for this overflow message: IGT tests that read CRC data usually start CRC generation, read CRC data, stop CRC generation and validate the CRC data. Some tests are validating the CRC data even before stopping the CRC generation. If validating the CRC data results in a mismatch and therefore an assert, the test may quit without stopping the CRC generation. This can cause the CRC buffer to get filled up and the overflow error message shows up.

For example, here are few lines from tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c test which I think is the correct order - crc is stopped before validating the CRC data. But there are some tests which validate the CRC data before stopping the CRC. For example, in tests/kms_rotation_crc.c test_plane_rotation(), CRC data is validated before stopping the CRC.

From: from tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c:
--------------------------------------
pipe_crc = igt_pipe_crc_new(data->drm_fd, pipe, INTEL_PIPE_CRC_SOURCE_AUTO);
igt_pipe_crc_start(pipe_crc);

n_crcs = igt_pipe_crc_get_crcs(pipe_crc, N_CRCS, &crcs);

igt_pipe_crc_stop(pipe_crc);
igt_pipe_crc_free(pipe_crc);


/* and ensure that they'are all equal, we haven't changed the fb */
for (j = 0; j < (n_crcs - 1); j++)
    igt_assert_crc_equal(&crcs[j], &crcs[j + 1]);

Since each bug has got it's own priority, dropping the priority of this META bug to Medium.

-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --

This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity.

You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/101.