https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_4048/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html run.log: running: igt/gem_ppgtt/blt-vs-render-ctx0 [33/75] skip: 16, pass: 17 / FATAL: command execution failed ... Completed CI_IGT_test CI_DRM_4048/shard-kbl2/20 : FAILURE CI_IGT_test runtime 656 seconds Rebooting shard-kbl2 last dmesg: <6>[ 212.863962] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 240x67 <6>[ 212.974802] Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25 <7>[ 212.974851] [IGT] gem_ppgtt: executing
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_18/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_18/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctxn.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_18/fi-cfl-u/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_18/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctxn.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_18/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_18/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctxn.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_18/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_18/fi-skl-guc/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctxn.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_18/fi-kbl-r/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html
This looks like a regression and/or context leak issue that started with drmtip_18, setting priority to highest
Highest due to CFL-u
KBL-shards so far 6 runs consecutively: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_4060/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html to: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_4066/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html Also, note that all runs above have same IGT version, so maybe context leak.
the drmtip_18 occurences from Comment 1 have the same IGT version and thus testlist as: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_4048/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html from the Description comment.
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_23/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_23/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_23/fi-kbl-7567u/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_23/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html same testlist as: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_4066/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctx0.html
Last seen one week ago, with 134 / 490 runs (27.3%)
Hi Marta, could you please test again with the latest drm-tip? I executed the gem_ppgtt/blt-vs-render-ctx0 test and passes. I tested on a KBL. Thanks, Andi
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 106887 ***
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived. New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.