The test really does not mean much. How can a placeholder test be invalid? Could we rename this test to something like @reload-to-enable-gvt?
The test doesn't do anything, all it was was a placeholder to show how to reload i915 with gvt enabled. It was meant to be replaced by a suite of tests for gvt, but that never happened and we still have no knowledge of when we break their code.
I think the right thing to do is to simply remove it from BAT. I still hope that we gain some gvt tests.
No more intriguingly named tests, commit 8781fd89a63eabed9359d02b50583cca67ff3673 (HEAD, upstream/master) Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Fri Jul 13 18:55:10 2018 +0100 igt: Remove gvt_basic This was always a placeholder for GVT stakeholders to provide some better tests. 2 years later and none have been put forward so stop wasting CI's time running a placeholder. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106989 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com> Acked-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com>
igt@gvt_basic test is removed. Closing the bug.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.