Bug 108652 - I suspect that in kernel 4.19 power limit decreased in 4 times on Vega GPU
Summary: I suspect that in kernel 4.19 power limit decreased in 4 times on Vega GPU
Status: RESOLVED MOVED
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/AMDgpu (show other bugs)
Version: XOrg git
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Default DRI bug account
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2018-11-05 07:54 UTC by mikhail.v.gavrilov
Modified: 2019-11-19 09:03 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments
shining LEDs (now in 4K scenarios) (235.90 KB, image/jpeg)
2018-11-05 07:54 UTC, mikhail.v.gavrilov
no flags Details
Project CARS 2 - screenshot with FPS counter (11.72 MB, image/png)
2018-11-06 16:39 UTC, mikhail.v.gavrilov
no flags Details
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - screenshot with FPS counter (11.88 MB, image/png)
2018-11-06 16:40 UTC, mikhail.v.gavrilov
no flags Details

Description mikhail.v.gavrilov 2018-11-05 07:54:02 UTC
Created attachment 142364 [details]
shining LEDs (now in 4K scenarios)

I suspect that in kernel 4.19 power limit decreased in 4 times on Vega GPU
I remember that earlier in the GPU bound scenarios all LED are shining. Now I have never seen more than two LEDs shining at the same time even when GPU is 100% loaded (I see this by HUD monitoring)
I even forgot when I heard last time when turbine roared.

From the point of view of audio comfort, this is all great, but the feeling that video card was became weaker does not leave me, and it upsets. Unfortunately, I have nothing to compare I don't like use old kernels because they have a lot of not fixed old bugs.
Comment 1 Alex Deucher 2018-11-05 15:38:13 UTC
Has the performance changed in any specific applications?
Comment 2 mikhail.v.gavrilov 2018-11-06 16:37:21 UTC
I would welcome any increase of FPS since I play on a 4K monitor.

1) Project CARS 2

GFX Clocks and Power:
	700 MHz (MCLK)
	984 MHz (SCLK)
	1269 MHz (PSTATE_SCLK)
	700 MHz (PSTATE_MCLK)
	818 mV (VDDGFX)
	62.0 W (average GPU)

GPU Temperature: 74 C
GPU Load: 100 %

7 FPS on medium settings it's FAIL.
I am sure that Vega 64 can do 50FPS on high settings:
Proof: https://youtu.be/tpBubGwj8Fo


2) Shadow of the Tomb Raider

GFX Clocks and Power:
	700 MHz (MCLK)
	981 MHz (SCLK)
	1269 MHz (PSTATE_SCLK)
	700 MHz (PSTATE_MCLK)
	818 mV (VDDGFX)
	76.0 W (average GPU)

GPU Temperature: 74 C
GPU Load: 99 %

15 FPS on high settings it's better that in previous game, but I am sure that Vega 64 can do 30FPS on more higher settings:
Proof: https://youtu.be/ZIA_GjcB8BQ?t=66


So we see that Vega has 981 MHz instead of possible 1500 MHz and power consumption 76.0 W instead of 240 W.

I can only guess why GPU consumer qualities were reduced.

# cat /sys/class/drm/card0/device/power_dpm_state
performance

# cat /sys/class/drm/card0/device/power_dpm_force_performance_level
auto
Comment 3 mikhail.v.gavrilov 2018-11-06 16:39:00 UTC
Created attachment 142389 [details]
Project CARS 2 - screenshot with FPS counter
Comment 4 mikhail.v.gavrilov 2018-11-06 16:40:33 UTC
Created attachment 142390 [details]
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - screenshot with FPS counter
Comment 5 Martin Peres 2019-11-19 09:03:32 UTC
-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --

This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity.

You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/issues/594.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.