https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_157/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-10ms.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_157/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-immediate.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_157/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_157/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_157/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-10ms.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_157/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-immediate.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_157/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_157/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend.html Starting subtest: in-flight-suspend (gem_eio:1117) ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function gem_execbuf_wr, file ../lib/ioctl_wrappers.c:635: (gem_eio:1117) ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf_wr(fd, execbuf) == 0 (gem_eio:1117) ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: error: -5 != 0 Subtest in-flight-suspend failed.
Seems to be a regression, as it has been 100% reproducible since drmtip_157.
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Wed Jan 30 13:09:59 2019 +0000 i915/gem_eio: 64 batches may be too many for some devices! Actually measure how many batches we can fit into a ring before blocking, or else we may end up hanging the device earlier than expected! v2: Mostly conservative. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109014 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
(In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #2) > Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Date: Wed Jan 30 13:09:59 2019 +0000 > > i915/gem_eio: 64 batches may be too many for some devices! > > Actually measure how many batches we can fit into a ring before > blocking, or else we may end up hanging the device earlier than > expected! > > v2: Mostly conservative. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109014 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> No failures since the patch, when it used to be seen every run (except for ~10 runs for some reason). Anyway, not seen for over 30 runs now. Closing!
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived. New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.