https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5388/shard-iclb2/igt@pm_sseu@full-enable.html Test requirement: gem.spinfunc Last errno: 2, No such file or directory
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated. ### New filters associated * ICL: igt@pm_sseu@full-enable - skip - Test requirement: gem.spinfunc, Last errno: 2, No such file or directory - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5388/shard-iclb2/igt@pm_sseu@full-enable.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_3578/shard-iclb5/igt@pm_sseu@full-enable.html
Matt, could you take a look?
According to Tony Ye, the gen9 media kernel + batch setup should also work with gen11, without modification. I guess we just need to send something as RFT to confirm that...
I wonder if we should enable this now that dynamic SSEU is merged. Tvrtko?
It is not exactly related to Dynamic SSEU but I have sent a patch which enables gen9 media spin func usage on gen11 for testing.
Btw, are skips automatically logged as bugs? Makes sense on a PASS -> SKIP transition, but this test was always skipping on gen11 AFAICS.
> It is not exactly related to Dynamic SSEU but I have sent a patch which > enables gen9 media spin func usage on gen11 for testing. Did it help? I see the RFT on the mailing list but I don't now how to check the outcome.
Unfortunately no Icelake results from the shards, they are excluded. But there is another source of information which says gen9 media spin kernel is not completely right for gen11. So I kind of parked the patch it being stuck between the two sets of conflicting empirical evidence.
Should we remove the test for gen11?
The test is already not being run on icl; you mean mark the bug as wontfix until further notice.
As per Chris' comment
(In reply to Tvrtko Ursulin from comment #6) > Btw, are skips automatically logged as bugs? Makes sense on a PASS -> SKIP > transition, but this test was always skipping on gen11 AFAICS. All skips are considered as bugs, and acceptable skips are closed as NOTABUG. This is the only way to draw attention and assess if something is missing or not. For example, we could have forgotten to add mocs settings for ICL if we had not had such process. (In reply to Tvrtko Ursulin from comment #8) > Unfortunately no Icelake results from the shards, they are excluded. Just for clarification: we have no icl sharded runs for pre-merge testing, but post-merge runs are still done and this bug still has 100% reproduction rate.
I am reopening the bug, as the loss of coverage has not been explained and it also affects TGL.
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: {- ICL: igt@pm_sseu@full-enable - skip - Test requirement: gem.spinfunc, Last errno: 2, No such file or directory -} {+ ICL TGL: igt@pm_sseu@full-enable - skip - Test requirement: gem.spinfunc, Last errno: 2, No such file or directory, SKIP +} New failures caught by the filter: * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_362/fi-tgl-u/igt@i915_pm_sseu@full-enable.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_365/fi-tgl-u/igt@i915_pm_sseu@full-enable.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_363/fi-tgl-u/igt@i915_pm_sseu@full-enable.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_364/fi-tgl-u/igt@i915_pm_sseu@full-enable.html
There is no *loss* of coverage to explain. There was _lack_ of coverage ever since the start of Gen11. The task is about finding someone who can write/adapt a spinning media kernel for gen11+.
This test is not expected to work from gen11 onwards.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.