https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_197/fi-gdg-551/igt@gem_cpu_reloc@forked.html Starting subtest: forked gem_cpu_reloc: ../lib/igt_core.c:1030: igt_skip: Assertion `!test_child' failed. Received signal SIGABRT.
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated. ### New filters associated * BWR GDG: igt@gem_cpu_reloc@forked - fail - igt_skip: Assertion `!test_child' failed. - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_197/fi-bwr-2160/igt@gem_cpu_reloc@forked.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_197/fi-gdg-551/igt@gem_cpu_reloc@forked.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_198/fi-bwr-2160/igt@gem_cpu_reloc@forked.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_198/fi-gdg-551/igt@gem_cpu_reloc@forked.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_199/fi-bwr-2160/igt@gem_cpu_reloc@forked.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_199/fi-gdg-551/igt@gem_cpu_reloc@forked.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_200/fi-bwr-2160/igt@gem_cpu_reloc@forked.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_200/fi-gdg-551/igt@gem_cpu_reloc@forked.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_201/fi-bwr-2160/igt@gem_cpu_reloc@forked.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_201/fi-gdg-551/igt@gem_cpu_reloc@forked.html
igt mishandling a igt_skip from inside an igt_fork; usually procedure is to move the skip check before the fork.
Hmm, there are no skips here, so the test failed and we got no error message from the child. That's quite a nasty igt bug.
Found the skip, patch sent.
commit 4049adf01014af077df2174def4fadf7cecb066e (HEAD, upstream/master) Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Wed Jan 30 16:18:58 2019 +0000 i915/gem_cpu_reloc: Do the can-store-dword check at start igt doesn't handle skipping from inside igt_fork very gracefully and crashes instead of reporting the lack of requirements. One solution would be to fix igt, but far easier is to just move the requirement checking around to do it before we even fork. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109493 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
(In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #5) > commit 4049adf01014af077df2174def4fadf7cecb066e (HEAD, upstream/master) > Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Date: Wed Jan 30 16:18:58 2019 +0000 > > i915/gem_cpu_reloc: Do the can-store-dword check at start > > igt doesn't handle skipping from inside igt_fork very gracefully and > crashes instead of reporting the lack of requirements. One solution > would be to fix igt, but far easier is to just move the requirement > checking around to do it before we even fork. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109493 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Thanks, it definitely did the trick as it was seen twice every single run between drmtip_197 and 203, and nothing for 34 runs :)
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived. New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.