The following tests regressed: piglit.spec.arb_cull_distance.basic-cull-4 piglit.spec.arb_cull_distance.basic-cull-2 piglit.spec.arb_cull_distance.basic-cull-3 piglit.spec.arb_cull_distance.basic-cull-1 piglit.spec.arb_cull_distance.vs-cull-distance-vertex-inside-cull-volume piglit.spec.arb_cull_distance.vs-cull-distance-vertex-outside-cull-volume piglit.spec.arb_cull_distance.fs-cull-distance-interpolated piglit.spec.arb_cull_distance.vs-cull-distance-vertex-on-plane KHR-GL33.cull_distance.functional KHR-GL46.cull_distance.functional Bisected to: 4e69fba534e7377f3bc6c40c73e6bc5c23437d4e Author: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net> nir: Rewrite lower_clip_cull_distance_arrays to do a lot less lowering Instead of going to all the work of to combine them into one array, just make two arrays and use location_frac to colocate them within CLIP0. Then the back-end can sort things out and stack them on top of each other. Thanks to ef99f4c8, we also don't need to set compact anymore. Reviewed-by: Alejandro Piñeiro <apinheiro@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 109717 ***
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.