https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5797/fi-ilk-650/igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic.html (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function __real_main117, file ../tests/i915/gem_tiled_pread_basic.c:218: (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: expected == found (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) CRITICAL: Bad read [0]: 0 instead of 131456 at 0x00083000 [tile (384, 256) subtile (0, 0)] for read from 0x00000000 to 0x00100000, swizzle=bit9^10 Test gem_tiled_pread_basic failed. **** DEBUG **** (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) igt_core-INFO: IGT-Version: 1.23-gba96339c (x86_64) (Linux: 5.1.0-rc1-CI-CI_DRM_5797+ x86_64) (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) drmtest-DEBUG: Test requirement passed: !(fd<0) (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) igt_debugfs-DEBUG: Opening debugfs directory '/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0' (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) DEBUG: Test requirement passed: gem_get_tiling(fd, handle, &tiling, &swizzle) (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function __real_main117, file ../tests/i915/gem_tiled_pread_basic.c:218: (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: expected == found (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) CRITICAL: Bad read [0]: 0 instead of 131456 at 0x00083000 [tile (384, 256) subtile (0, 0)] for read from 0x00000000 to 0x00100000, swizzle=bit9^10 (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) igt_core-INFO: Stack trace: (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) igt_core-INFO: #0 ../lib/igt_core.c:1474 __igt_fail_assert() (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) igt_core-INFO: #1 ../tests/i915/gem_tiled_pread_basic.c:169 __real_main117() (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) igt_core-INFO: #2 ../tests/i915/gem_tiled_pread_basic.c:117 main() (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) igt_core-INFO: #3 ../csu/libc-start.c:344 __libc_start_main() (gem_tiled_pread_basic:2619) igt_core-INFO: #4 [_start+0x2a] **** END **** https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5799/fi-blb-e6850/igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4901/fi-blb-e6850/igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic.html
commit 3d325bb211d8cd84c6862c9945185a937395cb44 (upstream/master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Sun Mar 24 14:11:16 2019 +0000 i915: Mark up some forgotten set-domain It is the user's responsibility to manage their domains. In libdrm, when you mmap a pointer, it calls set-domain automatically, but igt requires the caller to manage it explicitly, so do so. The vast majority already do correct manage the domain as they use the pointer into the mmap, just a few have been missed over the years. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated. ### New filters associated * BLB ILK BSW: igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic - fail - Failed assertion: expected == found - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5797/fi-ilk-650/igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5799/fi-blb-e6850/igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5802/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4901/fi-blb-e6850/igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic.html
(In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #1) > commit 3d325bb211d8cd84c6862c9945185a937395cb44 (upstream/master, > origin/master, origin/HEAD) > Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Date: Sun Mar 24 14:11:16 2019 +0000 > > i915: Mark up some forgotten set-domain > > It is the user's responsibility to manage their domains. In libdrm, when > you mmap a pointer, it calls set-domain automatically, but igt requires > the caller to manage it explicitly, so do so. The vast majority already > do correct manage the domain as they use the pointer into the mmap, just > a few have been missed over the years. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Thanks, seems to have fixed the issue!
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived. New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.