Bug 110854 - [CI][SHARDS] igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke - skip - Test requirement: ncontext, SKIP
Summary: [CI][SHARDS] igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke - skip - Test requirement: ncontext,...
Status: RESOLVED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Intel (show other bugs)
Version: XOrg git
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-06-07 12:05 UTC by Martin Peres
Modified: 2019-06-07 12:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Peres 2019-06-07 12:05:45 UTC
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5039/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html

Starting subtest: smoke
Test requirement not met in function smoketest, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c:1196:
Test requirement: ncontext
Last errno: 19, No such device
Subtest smoke: SKIP (0.538s)
Comment 1 CI Bug Log 2019-06-07 12:06:24 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* CML ICL: igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke - skip - Test requirement: ncontext, SKIP
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3103/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/re-cml-u/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5039/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5040/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3119/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13179/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3120/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3117/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_4389/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_302/fi-cml-u/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_302/fi-cml-u2/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_4390/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6196/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13181/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5041/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3122/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
Comment 2 Chris Wilson 2019-06-07 12:17:24 UTC
Some of the shard-icl have the second vcs fused off and so cannot perform load balancing between the pair of vcs. You could treat this as a CI bug; time to retire the old HW.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.